[Mod: Split from LTAV part deux]
I think you can forget about any panhard related products..army tied them selves up in knots with Panhard contracts for 30 years..they won't go down that road again..any VBL was tested 15 years ago..two small it was intended to replace the AML in the recce role.The cavs comitment to CTR has turned the requirement on its head..so bigger vehicle that VBL type needed.
on similar note...loks like our new general service vehicle and FFRs will be a land Rover product..so the word on the street is.
I think you can forget about any panhard related products..army tied them selves up in knots with Panhard contracts for 30 years..they won't go down that road again..any VBL was tested 15 years ago..two small it was intended to replace the AML in the recce role.The cavs comitment to CTR has turned the requirement on its head..so bigger vehicle that VBL type needed.
on similar note...loks like our new general service vehicle and FFRs will be a land Rover product..so the word on the street is.
Comment