I see that some of the female members of the NS who also happen to be mothers are up in arms about the conflict between their carreers and the maternal role from Todays examiner.
What the **** do they think the navy is ......
These were always the issues that disbarred women from the navy in the past and are starting to come back to haunt them now.
Was it not explained to these women that going to sea on patrol was an integral part of the navy.
If they choose to have children that the service should not have to change its patrolling arrangements to suit them.
Every other navy in the world that has seagoing female personnel has similar circumstances but the bottom line is if you are seagoing personnel you must go to sea.These females joined on the pretext of being equal to their male counterparts and now that mother nature has kicked in they want different terms to their male counter parts.
Now thats real discrimination.
Would they like creche facilities on Naval vessels ...maybe the night watches could include a member to do the feeds and change nappies.......sorry sir where do I put the car seat in the RIB.
This is totally out rageous.....they signed on to do a specific job and if they cannot do the role that they enlisted for they should leave.
Civilian employers may be able to make allowances for such happenings but to think that the NS may even consider altering its routines for such matters what is the world comming to.
Just as well men can't have babies...the whole DF would be in the shit seeing as it is mainly made up of males.
I magine if Nelson was holding a baby at the battle of trafalgar...who wo have beat the french............Where do you put prams in a gun turret...........
Whats the world coming to........
I know this will piss off some of our female contributers but I saw this coming years ago and everbody said it would never happen....well it has!
What the **** do they think the navy is ......
These were always the issues that disbarred women from the navy in the past and are starting to come back to haunt them now.
Was it not explained to these women that going to sea on patrol was an integral part of the navy.
If they choose to have children that the service should not have to change its patrolling arrangements to suit them.
Every other navy in the world that has seagoing female personnel has similar circumstances but the bottom line is if you are seagoing personnel you must go to sea.These females joined on the pretext of being equal to their male counterparts and now that mother nature has kicked in they want different terms to their male counter parts.
Now thats real discrimination.
Would they like creche facilities on Naval vessels ...maybe the night watches could include a member to do the feeds and change nappies.......sorry sir where do I put the car seat in the RIB.
This is totally out rageous.....they signed on to do a specific job and if they cannot do the role that they enlisted for they should leave.
Civilian employers may be able to make allowances for such happenings but to think that the NS may even consider altering its routines for such matters what is the world comming to.
Just as well men can't have babies...the whole DF would be in the shit seeing as it is mainly made up of males.
I magine if Nelson was holding a baby at the battle of trafalgar...who wo have beat the french............Where do you put prams in a gun turret...........
Whats the world coming to........
I know this will piss off some of our female contributers but I saw this coming years ago and everbody said it would never happen....well it has!
Comment