Thanks Thanks:  12
Likes Likes:  24
Dislikes Dislikes:  2
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 37 of 37
  1. #26
    Lt General
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    4,196
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by apod View Post
    0-5: Initial contract
    5-9: Re-engagement
    9-12: Re-engagement
    12-21: Extension of service
    21+: Continuance in service in 2 year blocks up to retirement age.

    Those are the periods of time listed on our own A10 for manning control points, and the criteria associated at each point to "re-up". YES.Reserve service is included in our T&C's but we are being really pedantic if we are including that in our idea of how much time we serve.If a bloke does 5 years he will not turn around and say he did 12.

    As for Morale.Two words.

    It's Shit.

    No amount of "Town Halls" or "Climate Surveys" will change that if the words are falling on deaf ears.
    Actions speak louder than words.If a few senior Officers threatened to Resign(RIP Lt Gen Stapleton) I wonder would that grab the Minister's(Sorry. I mean Junior Minister as we don't seem to rate a full one) attention? Recruitment is a joke at this juncture. No point filling a bucket when there is a hole in the bottom.
    The person who must step up to the plate here (or take full responsibility) is the CoS. If pushed the "minister" will say he didn't know there was a problem as the CoS didn't tell him, and if he did etc..
    As happened some time ago on a prime time piece, where the "minister" threw the CoS under the bus.
    So it's now or never.
    German 1: Private Schnutz, I have bad news for you.
    German 2: Private? I am a general!
    German 1: That is the bad news.

  2. Thanks apod, DeV thanked for this post
    Likes DeV, hptmurphy liked this post
  3. #27
    CQMS
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    189
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by na grohmití View Post
    The person who must step up to the plate here (or take full responsibility) is the CoS. If pushed the "minister" will say he didn't know there was a problem as the CoS didn't tell him, and if he did etc..
    As happened some time ago on a prime time piece, where the "minister" threw the CoS under the bus.
    So it's now or never.
    Since the COS realised that the DF was as high as he was going and that there was nothing to be gained by being a whipping boy he has been much better in not just my view but many of my peers as well

  4. Likes apod liked this post
  5. #28
    Commander in Chief apod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Ass in the grass.
    Posts
    5,028
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Fantasia View Post
    5-9 is Extension of Service
    9-12 is Extension of Service
    12-21 is Re-engage to complete 21 years.

    It is not being pedantic. Every person that enlists for general service does so for 12 years made up as I previously mentioned. Not 5 years!

    People that enlist for purposes other tban general service have the same period of engagement but made up differently 0-4, 4-9 and 9-12 is used for TTS
    I had a feeling my terminology was off Vis a vis re-engage vs extension.My bad.

    BUT.

    Yes. It IS being pedantic.

    Ask any soldier in any unit what their initial contract is and they will say 5 years. No one counts the 7 FLR.
    Infantry Corps - An Lámh Comhrac


    "Let us be clear about three facts:First of all.All battles and all wars are won in the end by the Infantryman.Secondly the Infantryman bears the brunt of the fighting,his casualties are heavier and he suffers greater extremes of fatigue and discomfort than the other arms.Thirdly,the art of the Infantryman is less stereotyped and harder to acquire than that of any other arm".
    -- Field Marshall Earl Wavell.1948

  6. Likes DeV liked this post
  7. #29
    Commander in Chief apod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Ass in the grass.
    Posts
    5,028
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Fantasia View Post
    Since the COS realised that the DF was as high as he was going and that there was nothing to be gained by being a whipping boy he has been much better in not just my view but many of my peers as well
    I think you have just summed up the major problem with the Officer Corps(and SNCO's). Too worried about their careers and moving up instead of looking after their troops.
    Other Armies laugh at us when they hear we have representative associations as they retort "That's what our Officers are for".

    The troops are not stupid.They can tell who the good Leaders are as they put themselves last.

    It has never ceased to amaze me how much an officer can accomplish once they stop worrying about the next promotion.
    Infantry Corps - An Lámh Comhrac


    "Let us be clear about three facts:First of all.All battles and all wars are won in the end by the Infantryman.Secondly the Infantryman bears the brunt of the fighting,his casualties are heavier and he suffers greater extremes of fatigue and discomfort than the other arms.Thirdly,the art of the Infantryman is less stereotyped and harder to acquire than that of any other arm".
    -- Field Marshall Earl Wavell.1948

  8. Likes na grohmití, DeV, hptmurphy liked this post
  9. #30
    CQMS
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    189
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by apod View Post
    I had a feeling my terminology was off Vis a vis re-engage vs extension.My bad.

    BUT.

    Yes. It IS being pedantic.

    Ask any soldier in any unit what their initial contract is and they will say 5 years. No one counts the 7 FLR.
    It will be counted if they try and leave.

  10. #31
    CQMS
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    189
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by apod View Post
    I think you have just summed up the major problem with the Officer Corps(and SNCO's). Too worried about their careers and moving up instead of looking after their troops.
    Other Armies laugh at us when they hear we have representative associations as they retort "That's what our Officers are for".

    The troops are not stupid.They can tell who the good Leaders are as they put themselves last.

    It has never ceased to amaze me how much an officer can accomplish once they stop worrying about the next promotion.
    There are militaries with much worse unionisation than ours. The Finns down tools when they reach their weekly work hours regardless of what is going on. They will get up and walk out of a meeting and say "my hours are done"

  11. Thanks DeV thanked for this post
  12. #32
    Commander in Chief apod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Ass in the grass.
    Posts
    5,028
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Fantasia View Post
    There are militaries with much worse unionisation than ours. The Finns down tools when they reach their weekly work hours regardless of what is going on. They will get up and walk out of a meeting and say "my hours are done"
    Yeah but at the end of the day we are professionals and they have a conscript mentality.
    It's going to be fun for us trying to implement the WTD. We need to do it but by the same token we can't have people just walking off the job in the middle of a task.

    Anyway. We digress.Perhaps we should open a new thread on Retention and maybe try to come up with some outside of the box ideas that might help?
    Infantry Corps - An Lámh Comhrac


    "Let us be clear about three facts:First of all.All battles and all wars are won in the end by the Infantryman.Secondly the Infantryman bears the brunt of the fighting,his casualties are heavier and he suffers greater extremes of fatigue and discomfort than the other arms.Thirdly,the art of the Infantryman is less stereotyped and harder to acquire than that of any other arm".
    -- Field Marshall Earl Wavell.1948

  13. Likes DeV, Fantasia liked this post
  14. #33
    Moderator DeV's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    East
    Posts
    21,100
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Fantasia View Post
    It will be counted if they try and leave.

    Have a look at the strength of the FLR

    It isn’t enforced. As at 31/8/12 the strength of the FLR was 264 all ranks. FLR Personnel haven’t been called up for training since 1987 (there have been NS Officers who have been) and the annual cost is still € ~60k. Source for that is the RDF VFM.

    If the contractual obligations were enforced the FLR strength would be a lot higher.

    Have a look at the current FLR strength on IKON ..... bet it is even lower (which considering the amount of people leaving it should be much higher).

  15. Likes Truck Driver liked this post
  16. #34
    CQMS
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    189
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by DeV View Post
    Have a look at the strength of the FLR

    It isn’t enforced. As at 31/8/12 the strength of the FLR was 264 all ranks. FLR Personnel haven’t been called up for training since 1987 (there have been NS Officers who have been) and the annual cost is still € ~60k. Source for that is the RDF VFM.

    If the contractual obligations were enforced the FLR strength would be a lot higher.

    Have a look at the current FLR strength on IKON ..... bet it is even lower (which considering the amount of people leaving it should be much higher).
    Trust me when I tell you it is very much enforced. The reason is very few people use their exact 5yr & 9yr anniversaries as jumping off points. Even those that do pay their tenner in old money and go.

    You would be very surprised how many leave, try to get residency in another country and when they say that they were in the DF and they look to see their discharge papers look to buy themselves off the FLR as they cannot get approved otherwise

  17. Thanks DeV thanked for this post
  18. #35
    Commander in Chief hptmurphy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    13,538
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by na grohmití View Post
    The person who must step up to the plate here (or take full responsibility) is the CoS. If pushed the "minister" will say he didn't know there was a problem as the CoS didn't tell him, and if he did etc..
    As happened some time ago on a prime time piece, where the "minister" threw the CoS under the bus.
    So it's now or never.
    Problem being falling on ones sword in an army such as ours, theres plenty will step over you to get at the position, to have any meaning others would have to refuse to fill the post.
    Time for another break I think......

  19. #36
    Sergeant Major
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    895
    Post Thanks / Like
    Nothing like finding out if your leadership is up to task by looking around and seeing if anyone is still with you

  20. #37
    Lord Chief Bottlewasher trellheim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Cathal Brugha
    Posts
    9,523
    Post Thanks / Like
    In 31 years I dont think I've ever seen an FLR parade.
    "Are they trying to shoot down the other drone? "

    "No, they're trying to fly the tank"

  21. Likes Truck Driver liked this post

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •