Thanks Thanks:  137
Likes Likes:  343
Dislikes Dislikes:  14
Page 30 of 30 FirstFirst ... 20282930
Results 726 to 743 of 743
  1. #726
    Moderator DeV's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    East
    Posts
    19,750
    Post Thanks / Like
    The 105s could do with a relatively inexpensive upgrade in order to be deployed effectively

    There are very few modern 6x6/8x8 APCs mounting a 90mm (or bigger). There could be reasons for and against.

    But if the Scorpions are to be replaced I’d be firmly of the opinion that it must be a MOWAG variant

  2. Likes GoneToTheCanner liked this post
  3. #727
    Lieutenant X-RayOne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    dublin
    Posts
    1,270
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by DeV View Post
    The 105s could do with a relatively inexpensive upgrade in order to be deployed effectively
    What issue with them needs an overseas upgrade??
    The people of England have been led in Mesopotamia into a trap from which it will be hard to escape with dignity and honour. They have been tricked into it by a steady withholding of information. The Baghdad communiqués are belated, insincere, incomplete.....It is a disgrace to our imperial record, and may soon be too inflamed for any ordinary cure.We are to-day not far from a disaster.

    T.E. Lawrence, 2 Aug 1920.

  4. #728
    Major General
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    3,334
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by DeV View Post
    The 105s could do with a relatively inexpensive upgrade in order to be deployed effectively

    There are very few modern 6x6/8x8 APCs mounting a 90mm (or bigger). There could be reasons for and against.

    But if the Scorpions are to be replaced I’d be firmly of the opinion that it must be a MOWAG variant
    Simple reason behind that. Unless you are an actual tank, if you fire a single big loud round against a hard target, revealing your location (as a recce force) to all nearby, modern countermeasures will have you destroyed before you can get the second round off. Wheeled AFV weapons are there to shoot and scoot. Not Stalk and shoot. That's the anti armour detatchment's job.
    Well, there's good news and bad news. The bad news is that Neil will be taking over both branches, and some of you will lose your jobs. Those of you who are kept on will have to relocate to Swindon, if you wanna stay. I know, gutting. On a more positive note, the good news is, I've been promoted, so... every cloud. You're still thinking about the bad news aren't you?

  5. #729
    Moderator DeV's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    East
    Posts
    19,750
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by X-RayOne View Post
    What issue with them needs an overseas upgrade??
    Something like LINAPS, it wouldn’t be essential but offer advantages

    Quote Originally Posted by na grohmitďż˝ View Post
    Simple reason behind that. Unless you are an actual tank, if you fire a single big loud round against a hard target, revealing your location (as a recce force) to all nearby, modern countermeasures will have you destroyed before you can get the second round off. Wheeled AFV weapons are there to shoot and scoot. Not Stalk and shoot. That's the anti armour detatchment's job.
    Yes and often those 30mm recce vehicles (in conventional warfare at least will be near friendly tanks, obviously we don’t have any).

    Maybe there is an argument as part of a Scorpion replacement for 1ACS to be equipped with MOWAG MRVs and MOWAGs with a LRATGW (ie longer range than Javelin).

    However, adding another missile to the inventory????

  6. #730
    Space Lord of Terra morpheus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Metropolis
    Posts
    2,983
    Post Thanks / Like
    We only have 3 missile types in the entire military... whats the big deal?
    "He is an enemy officer taken in battle and entitled to fair treatment."
    "No, sir. He's a sergeant, and they don't deserve no respect at all, sir. I should know. They're cunning and artful, if they're any good. I wouldn't mind if he was an officer, sir. But sergeants are clever."

  7. #731
    C/S
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    6,358
    Post Thanks / Like
    @na gromiti, staying concealed is all very well for recce work but a lot of the current DF work abroad is staying highly visible in white vehicles. With regard to gun versus missile, cost is a major factor and the DoD/DoF is always on permanent overwatch when it comes to DF spending. I'd rather have a 90mm gun on a familiar platform, with a projected service life of thirty years, than a missile system that costs (insert supposed cost here) and has a very finite life, ie, missile time-ex'd after five or ten years. I'd love to see the faces on the DoD people if the Irish started squirting off Javelins like they were going out of fashion, in some dusty place against some toerag who's got a troop of technicals and wants to go head to head. "you spent how much??!!"

  8. Likes apc, DeV liked this post
  9. #732
    Moderator DeV's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    East
    Posts
    19,750
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by morpheus View Post
    We only have 3 missile types in the entire military... whats the big deal?
    So adding a small number of a new type is a huge percentage increase and a high life cycle cost

    A 90 is also more versatile

    Quote Originally Posted by GoneToTheCanner View Post
    @na gromiti, staying concealed is all very well for recce work but a lot of the current DF work abroad is staying highly visible in white vehicles. With regard to gun versus missile, cost is a major factor and the DoD/DoF is always on permanent overwatch when it comes to DF spending. I'd rather have a 90mm gun on a familiar platform, with a projected service life of thirty years, than a missile system that costs (insert supposed cost here) and has a very finite life, ie, missile time-ex'd after five or ten years. I'd love to see the faces on the DoD people if the Irish started squirting off Javelins like they were going out of fashion, in some dusty place against some toerag who's got a troop of technicals and wants to go head to head. "you spent how much??!!"
    +1

    I was actually thinking longer range than Javelin

  10. #733
    Moderator DeV's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    East
    Posts
    19,750
    Post Thanks / Like
    It would appear that an extended range version of Javelin (>4 km) is being worked on (not sure if fielded yet)

  11. #734
    BQMS
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Johannesburg
    Posts
    502
    Post Thanks / Like
    While I'm mightily annoyed at the DF's habit of writing and rewriting doctrine to make all they plan to do reflect the minimum equipment level we think the DoD will permit, MBTs are a bit of a stretch at the moment. Conceptually, not practically - even Singapore has tanks. Asking the DF to incorporate an entirely new doctrine to the cavalry is a generational job.
    If they are ever contemplated, it has to be a leopard or better. Not a cast-off that's on the replacement track.

    Fire support for overseas missions does seem a no-brainer though and I really wonder why artillery are not brought to the field. On most of the Irish Army's ops they could stay happily dug in at camp. Whatever about tanks (always nice but the French AMX10RC seemed to hit the spot in Mali) an army that doesn't have artillery and deploy it is not an army, its a gendarmerie. I hate saying that where gun bunnies can hear, but it's true.

  12. Likes X-RayOne, na grohmití liked this post
  13. #735
    Moderator DeV's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    East
    Posts
    19,750
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by expat01 View Post
    While I'm mightily annoyed at the DF's habit of writing and rewriting doctrine to make all they plan to do reflect the minimum equipment level we think the DoD will permit, MBTs are a bit of a stretch at the moment. Conceptually, not practically - even Singapore has tanks. Asking the DF to incorporate an entirely new doctrine to the cavalry is a generational job.
    If they are ever contemplated, it has to be a leopard or better. Not a cast-off that's on the replacement track.

    Fire support for overseas missions does seem a no-brainer though and I really wonder why artillery are not brought to the field. On most of the Irish Army's ops they could stay happily dug in at camp. Whatever about tanks (always nice but the French AMX10RC seemed to hit the spot in Mali) an army that doesn't have artillery and deploy it is not an army, its a gendarmerie. I hate saying that where gun bunnies can hear, but it's true.
    Irish doctrine says nothing of the sort

    We aren’t invading former lands that isn’t to say that patrols fire support available. But remember we are talking UN mandated PSOs. Generally they aren’t engaged in combat ops.

    The artillery we have doesn’t have precision capabilities and therefore wouldn’t be suitable.

    A direct fire gun is a much better option.

    Also remember that the UN would have to agre

  14. #736
    Lieutenant X-RayOne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    dublin
    Posts
    1,270
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by DeV View Post
    The artillery we have doesn’t have precision capabilities and therefore wouldn’t be suitable.

    A direct fire gun is a much better option.
    Partially disagree Dev....arty support not about single round precision type fire support.....although accurate, fast indirect support is a definite.

    Think about alot of previous missions; east timor, liberia, chad, even Golan now. Lots of patrolling in sparcely populated, non built up areas. Accurate arty support for a screen, smoke, etc. to allow a dis-engagement in contact, prevent opposition forces advancing across an area would be hugely beneficial. Doesn't need to be laser guided super missiles, just accurate spread to cover required area.

    Yes direct fire would be great too....but probably better in areas where damage, casualties need to be limited, i.e. built up areas, taking a point target, etc. As it is 30mm and 40mm grenade launchers can handle that to an extent.
    The people of England have been led in Mesopotamia into a trap from which it will be hard to escape with dignity and honour. They have been tricked into it by a steady withholding of information. The Baghdad communiqués are belated, insincere, incomplete.....It is a disgrace to our imperial record, and may soon be too inflamed for any ordinary cure.We are to-day not far from a disaster.

    T.E. Lawrence, 2 Aug 1920.

  15. #737
    BQMS
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Johannesburg
    Posts
    502
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by DeV View Post
    Irish doctrine says nothing of the sort

    We aren’t invading former lands that isn’t to say that patrols fire support available. But remember we are talking UN mandated PSOs. Generally they aren’t engaged in combat ops.

    The artillery we have doesn’t have precision capabilities and therefore wouldn’t be suitable.

    A direct fire gun is a much better option.

    Also remember that the UN would have to agre
    So no mortars of any description then.
    You aren’t engaged in combat ops until you are, and it isn’t necessarily a choice you make. If 120s are available, why not 105s? Kept in the rear as a standby, a very effective force multiplier.

    I would agree that direct fire is preferable. But we don’t have any effective direct fire capability so it doesn’t matter whether the UN agrees or not. My point about artillery is that we have it, we train to use it and if a mission allows large calibre weaponry we can bring it to bear without purchasing new vehicles.
    First prize would be a wheeled vehicle with a 105.

  16. #738
    Moderator DeV's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    East
    Posts
    19,750
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by X-RayOne View Post
    Partially disagree Dev....arty support not about single round precision type fire support.....although accurate, fast indirect support is a definite.

    Think about alot of previous missions; east timor, liberia, chad, even Golan now. Lots of patrolling in sparcely populated, non built up areas. Accurate arty support for a screen, smoke, etc. to allow a dis-engagement in contact, prevent opposition forces advancing across an area would be hugely beneficial. Doesn't need to be laser guided super missiles, just accurate spread to cover required area.

    Yes direct fire would be great too....but probably better in areas where damage, casualties need to be limited, i.e. built up areas, taking a point target, etc. As it is 30mm and 40mm grenade launchers can handle that to an extent.
    Remember we are talking UN mandated forces not the advance into Iraq. It is a point absolutely but you seriously think the UN ROE would allow indirect unguided munitions to be used? Even in thinly populated areas you only have to get it wrong once

    SMK and ILLUM (as used by 120s with UNIFIL) possibly but HE no way

  17. #739
    BQMS
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Johannesburg
    Posts
    502
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by DeV View Post
    Remember we are talking UN mandated forces not the advance into Iraq. It is a point absolutely but you seriously think the UN ROE would allow indirect unguided munitions to be used? Even in thinly populated areas you only have to get it wrong once

    SMK and ILLUM (as used by 120s with UNIFIL) possibly but HE no way
    It has already happened, in the Congo last year.

  18. #740
    Moderator DeV's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    East
    Posts
    19,750
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by expat01 View Post
    It has already happened, in the Congo last year.
    With the intervention Bde who are a combat tasked formation

  19. #741
    BQMS
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Johannesburg
    Posts
    502
    Post Thanks / Like
    My point is that UN operations do not preclude the possibility.
    And the French have 155 self-propelled guns in UNIFIL.

    So in this decade the UN has:
    a) permitted the deployment of heavy artillery and low-level AA missiles in UNIFIL
    b) ordered aggressive combat operations to seek and destroy rebel forces in the DRC.

    This is no longer "yer daddy's UN", aimed at nobody's daddy in particular.
    Last edited by expat01; Today at 14:19.

  20. #742
    Moderator DeV's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    East
    Posts
    19,750
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by expat01 View Post
    My point is that UN operations do not preclude the possibility.
    And the French have 155 self-propelled guns in UNIFIL.

    So in this decade the UN has:
    a) permitted the deployment of heavy artillery and low-level AA missiles in UNIFIL
    b) ordered aggressive combat operations to seek and destroy rebel forces in the DRC.

    This is no longer "yer daddy's UN", aimed at nobody's daddy in particular.

    Absolutely but it doesn’t mean they have to be Irish guns either

    I’m not saying they shouldn’t be and neither is the State (a Fd Arty Bty is part of the Irish palette of forces offered)

  21. #743
    Space Lord of Terra morpheus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Metropolis
    Posts
    2,983
    Post Thanks / Like
    There were 105s in chad werent there? dutch?
    "He is an enemy officer taken in battle and entitled to fair treatment."
    "No, sir. He's a sergeant, and they don't deserve no respect at all, sir. I should know. They're cunning and artful, if they're any good. I wouldn't mind if he was an officer, sir. But sergeants are clever."

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 2 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •