Thanks Thanks:  281
Likes Likes:  512
Dislikes Dislikes:  7

View Poll Results: (Realistically) What best to replace the Peacock CPVs with?

Voters
62. You may not vote on this poll
  • Like for like (a similarly capable CPV)

    20 32.26%
  • 1-2 x OPVs (2 defending on available funds)

    39 62.90%
  • Larger number of much less capable patrol craft)

    3 4.84%
Page 29 of 29 FirstFirst ... 19272829
Results 701 to 702 of 702

Thread: CPV Replacement

  1. #701
    Moderator DeV's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    East
    Posts
    21,619
    Post Thanks / Like
    The Belgians and Dutch are involved in a MCM PESCO project
    https://pesco.europa.eu/project/mari...untermeasures/

    As well as some EDA projects
    https://www.eda.europa.eu/info-hub/p...oject-launched

  2. #702
    Lieutenant
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    1,353
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by EUFighter View Post
    Naval Group has won the Belgium/Dutch minesweeper competition. Now we will have to see if France joins the project to replace their similar vessels.

    https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news...l-competition/
    The consortium includes engineering groups that promote Robotics and some of whom out-think human logic and thought processes. I dislike anything that isn't controlled or input by the operator without choice or knowledge. Typical problems occur such as spurious engine shut downs or over complication of systems that causes loss of equipment function and controllability by the operator. Any ship must be designed by the user agency based on routines and tasks for offence and defence and other typical maritime roles.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •