Thanks Thanks:  98
Likes Likes:  118
Dislikes Dislikes:  15
Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 165

Thread: Rescue 116

  1. #51
    CQMS
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    235
    Post Thanks / Like
    Some services should not be privatised and this is one of them. What level of service could the aer core provide if it had an additional 50 million a year for 10 years.
    Last edited by ibenji; 16th March 2017 at 12:39.

  2. Likes EUFighter liked this post
    Dislikes na grohmití, warthog disliked this post
  3. #52
    Sergeant Major
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    814
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by ibenji View Post
    Some services should not be privatised and this is one of them. What level of service could the aer core provide if it had an additional 50 million a year for 10 years.
    You so sure that Finance would have signed off on the 92's if it was the AC asking for it?

  4. Likes DeV liked this post
  5. #53
    Moderator DeV's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    East
    Posts
    19,344
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by na grohmití View Post
    Don't declare yourself as an SAR asset unless you can commit to a 24/7 service.
    Which is why no AC aircraft has ever been a declared asset

    The MOU between the IRCG and DF (see 6.4)

    http://www.dttas.ie/sites/default/fi...efence-sla.pdf

  6. Thanks EUFighter, danno thanked for this post
    Likes Jack Booted Man liked this post
  7. #54
    CQMS
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    235
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Sparky42 View Post
    You so sure that Finance would have signed off on the 92's if it was the AC asking for it?
    Of course not. Why would the department of finance do anything that actually makes sense. They are the only section of the public service to get a pmds rating of 4 / 5 which they ignored what was happening in the boom times. The benefits of PPP's have not materialised especially for ireland

  8. #55
    Lord Chief Bottlewasher trellheim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Cathal Brugha
    Posts
    9,050
    Post Thanks / Like
    Remain on topic or be instabanned with no warning. Open another thread if you want to discuss
    "Are they trying to shoot down the other drone? "

    "No, they're trying to fly the tank"

  9. #56
    Brigadier General
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,570
    Post Thanks / Like
    Aer Corp had a Casa in the air by 4.30am to look for the missing aircraft.

  10. Likes ibenji liked this post
  11. #57
    Sergeant Major
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    814
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by sofa View Post
    Aer Corp had a Casa in the air by 4.30am to look for the missing aircraft.
    Different situation compared to when they weer asked to provide for Top Cover I guess.

  12. Likes DeV, EUFighter, Spark23 liked this post
    Dislikes The real Jack disliked this post
  13. #58
    Captain
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,671
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by sofa View Post
    Aer Corp had a Casa in the air by 4.30am to look for the missing aircraft.
    four hours after the aircraft went into the sea, and from a point more than 200km away - fantastic, are you ready to repel the Normans?

  14. #59
    C/S EUFighter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    312
    Post Thanks / Like
    The AC responded as best it could, it is not on 24hr standby, they put emergency plans into action and got people back to be able to launch the CASA. Although it shows some of the weakness in our system the main concern should first be recovery of the missing and finding out what happened to cause this tragic event. One of the key questions will be are the rest of the S92 fleet safe as they are still being crewed by brave men and women providing SAR around our shores. Once we know what happened then will be the time to see how we can improve the situation and hopefully avoid another such loss.

  15. Thanks sofa, na grohmití, restless thanked for this post
    Likes DeV liked this post
  16. #60
    Captain
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,671
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by EUFighter View Post
    The AC responded as best it could, it is not on 24hr standby, they put emergency plans into action and got people back to be able to launch the CASA...
    the first request for assistance was at around 10pm, for a rescue waaaaaaaay the hell out into the North Atlantic, at night, in March. even if they were not able to generate an aircraft immediately the alarms should have gone off that an aircraft was required - not least because 50% of the IRCG assets were involved in this rescue and unavailable for operations elsewhere. it then took them 6 hours to generate an 'emergency' response - does 'emergency' have a different meaning in the AC from the rest of the English speaking world?

    Quote Originally Posted by EUFighter View Post
    Although it shows some of the weakness in our system the main concern should first be recovery of the missing and finding out what happened to cause this tragic event. One of the key questions will be are the rest of the S92 fleet safe as they are still being crewed by brave men and women providing SAR around our shores. Once we know what happened then will be the time to see how we can improve the situation and hopefully avoid another such loss.
    no, the immediate priority to to address the capability gaps thrown into sharp relief by this tragedy - the cause of this could be anything, and it could be months before its known. we know that the top cover and emergency response capabilities are woefully inadaquate and there are things that could be done to adress that tomorow morning, we won't know if a seagull went to the engine or the FADEC failed, or a gearbox exploded until the FDR and CVR are retreived at the very least, and quite possibly until the wreckage is recovered from the sea floor.

    it is quite possible, likely perhaps, that in this instance the circumstances of the aircraft loss meant that the ability to react to an emergency was entirely irrelevent to whether lives would be lost or not, but we can see that in different circumstances the inability to react and to do so quickly might well be the difference between saving lives and recovering bodies.

    RIP, its bloody sad.

  17. Thanks apod, The real Jack thanked for this post
    Likes apod, na grohmití, Fridge Magnet, Sluggie liked this post
    Dislikes EUFighter disliked this post
  18. #61
    Corporal
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    152
    Post Thanks / Like
    I would contrast the Air Corps response to the Naval Service response. The NS has ships at sea with way bigger crews than any Air Corps plane - always! Strength for strength the NS is a much more efficient service.

  19. Likes na grohmití, Sluggie liked this post
    Dislikes The real Jack disliked this post
  20. #62
    Moderator DeV's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    East
    Posts
    19,344
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by ropebag View Post
    four hours after the aircraft went into the sea, and from a point more than 200km away - fantastic, are you ready to repel the Normans?
    I think the point he is making is that IRCG required top cover for the MEDEVAC quickly and no aircraft was available

    A missing helo would of course be a very different kettle of fish with much higher priority. Even with that level of priority it took a number of hours.

    Remember a helo has a reaction time of 15/45 mins. When the RAF had Nimrods their reaction time for TC was 1 hour (with RAF levels of crewing, aircraft numbers and resources.

  21. Thanks EUFighter, restless thanked for this post
    Likes Tempest liked this post
  22. #63
    C/S EUFighter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    312
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by ropebag View Post
    the first request for assistance was at around 10pm, for a rescue waaaaaaaay the hell out into the North Atlantic, at night, in March. even if they were not able to generate an aircraft immediately the alarms should have gone off that an aircraft was required - not least because 50% of the IRCG assets were involved in this rescue and unavailable for operations elsewhere. it then took them 6 hours to generate an 'emergency' response - does 'emergency' have a different meaning in the AC from the rest of the English speaking world?



    no, the immediate priority to to address the capability gaps thrown into sharp relief by this tragedy - the cause of this could be anything, and it could be months before its known. we know that the top cover and emergency response capabilities are woefully inadaquate and there are things that could be done to adress that tomorow morning, we won't know if a seagull went to the engine or the FADEC failed, or a gearbox exploded until the FDR and CVR are retreived at the very least, and quite possibly until the wreckage is recovered from the sea floor.

    it is quite possible, likely perhaps, that in this instance the circumstances of the aircraft loss meant that the ability to react to an emergency was entirely irrelevent to whether lives would be lost or not, but we can see that in different circumstances the inability to react and to do so quickly might well be the difference between saving lives and recovering bodies.

    RIP, its bloody sad.
    You need to get you timelines together before making such statements.
    2140 ICG Centre in Malin Head receives distress call from fishing boat 240km off the coast.
    2200 ICG request AC top cover, none was available at the time so the Dublin helicopter was tasked to assist.
    0045 ICG receives message from Rescue 116 it is about to land to refuel at Blacksod
    0100 ATC report loss of contact to Rescue 116 and emergency is declared.
    0420 AC CASA is airborne.

    It did not take 6 hours to respond as the incident only became the emergency once Rescue 116 went down. That another heli provides cover is standard practice and if nothing had happen most people would not be saying anything. Before anyone jumps to conclusions we need to find out what happened. As for our SAR capability this will not be affected in the short term as CHC has already allocated an aircraft to replace Rescue 116. That is why now the first task is to recover the missing crew and FDR/CVR. To find out what happened and then to see what need to happen.

    This tragic event should not be taken to begin yet another inter-service bashing game. The services and I include the CG in the list can and do work effectively together.

  23. Thanks danno, DeV thanked for this post
    Likes sofa, DeV, ias, restless liked this post
  24. #64
    Captain
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,671
    Post Thanks / Like
    You should learn to read, and then to count.

    Look at the timeline you yourself provide - six and a half hours between the AC being told that a major operation was ongoing 200+km off the west coast involving 50% of the total IRCG aviation assets and an aircraft being ready to leave the ground.

    Where do these people do their taxi driving sideline - Cardiff?

  25. #65
    Major General
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    3,043
    Post Thanks / Like
    Steady on, The AC do provide T/C when possible, in this instance the T/C request was declined straight up to avoid any faffing about as what happened in the organ transport fiasco. Having so declined the A/C had no further role until informed of the loss at 1.30 and thus got mobilised within 2.5 hours or so. Referring to 50% commitment by the Cg is meaningless given that every tasking will involve 25% of the unit and only becomes 50% if the Ac decline to do top cover. There have been instances when the Cg have put 75% of their force into a single incident.
    Is not the GASU on a 24/7 basis.

  26. Thanks DeV, The real Jack, EUFighter thanked for this post
    Likes DeV, ias liked this post
  27. #66
    Amadan Orion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Osborne's Very Very Broke Island
    Posts
    1,236
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by ropebag View Post
    You should learn to read, and then to count.

    Look at the timeline you yourself provide - six and a half hours between the AC being told that a major operation was ongoing 200+km off the west coast involving 50% of the total IRCG aviation assets and an aircraft being ready to leave the ground.

    Where do these people do their taxi driving sideline - Cardiff?
    I get your commitment to your point but perhaps you should take some time to reflect on your comments .....

  28. Thanks pym, restless thanked for this post
    Likes Jack Booted Man liked this post
  29. #67
    Chief Casey Ryback
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    941
    Post Thanks / Like
    Could someone clarify if 116 was on it's way to the rescue or returning from it , just curious as to why it was out over Black Rock coming in for a landing at Blacksod after having just passed it if it was coming from Dublin .
    Don't spit in my Bouillabaisse .

  30. #68
    C/S EUFighter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    312
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Laners View Post
    Could someone clarify if 116 was on it's way to the rescue or returning from it , just curious as to why it was out over Black Rock coming in for a landing at Blacksod after having just passed it if it was coming from Dublin .
    It was on the way there and had turned to land at Blacksod. I too am curious why it went out over Blackrock, does someone have any details on the standard approach into Blacksod ?

  31. #69
    Major General
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    3,043
    Post Thanks / Like
    Has anyone been able to capture the ais track of r116 and maybe put it up?

  32. #70
    Moderator DeV's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    East
    Posts
    19,344
    Post Thanks / Like
    image.pngimage.png
    Quote Originally Posted by danno View Post
    Has anyone been able to capture the ais track of r116 and maybe put it up?

  33. Thanks danno thanked for this post
  34. #71
    Commandant
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,887
    Post Thanks / Like
    R116 may have flown beyond Blacksod for direct VHF comms with the Sligo S92 crew, which was already out over the Atlantic, in order to get an update on the situation.

    The Sligo S92 had to press on with its own mission and got back to the scene at Blackrock at approx 02:10z. It must have been running very tight on fuel, but it stayed on until approx 03:00z when it was relieved by the Shannon S92 which was up at approx 02:05z.

    The first of the RNLI vessels arrived on scene at approx 02:35z.

    Casa crews know what its like to be out low over the atlantic at night and suffer an emergency e.g. engine failure. Once they had been alerted to the loss, right now I can't believe anything other than that they would have moved heaven and earth to get airborne and assist. But there's no two ways about it - it took a long time and no doubt that is going to be part of the investigation and changes will be recommended. We know the aircraft are getting on, we know the Air Corps doesn't possess a multi engine training aircraft anymore and we know C252 wasn't available on the day.

    From AIS, C253's movements on the day all approximate:

    From AIS C253
    Up approx 04:25z
    On scene 05:15z
    Dept scene 09:10z
    ===============
    Up approx (2) 11:35z
    On scene (2) 12:30z
    Dept (2) 18:20z

  35. Thanks EUFighter thanked for this post
  36. #72
    Major General
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    3,130
    Post Thanks / Like
    I would be reclucant to criticise Air Corps crew in this event. The situation is not of their making. However Air Corps management have permitted this situation to happen.
    They need to ask themselves:
    1. What is the Role of the Casa Maritime Patrol Aircraft?
    2. Is it the most suitable top cover aircraft?
    3. Is it possible to have a fixed wing search/top cover aircraft available 24/7
    4. If not, what is the point of having one?
    Well, there's good news and bad news. The bad news is that Neil will be taking over both branches, and some of you will lose your jobs. Those of you who are kept on will have to relocate to Swindon, if you wanna stay. I know, gutting. On a more positive note, the good news is, I've been promoted, so... every cloud. You're still thinking about the bad news aren't you?

  37. #73
    Commandant
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,887
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by na grohmití View Post
    I would be reclucant to criticise Air Corps crew in this event. The situation is not of their making. However Air Corps management have permitted this situation to happen.
    They need to ask themselves:
    1. What is the Role of the Casa Maritime Patrol Aircraft?
    2. Is it the most suitable top cover aircraft?
    3. Is it possible to have a fixed wing search/top cover aircraft available 24/7
    4. If not, what is the point of having one?
    I think all of those questions are going to have to be satisfactorily answered before any government gives a green light to any potential Casa replacement tender.

  38. #74
    Major General
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    3,043
    Post Thanks / Like
    http://www.irishtimes.com/news/irela...anes-1.2914983

    Regardless of ATC--Crewing etc 24/7 cover is not guaranteed.

  39. Thanks DeV, EUFighter thanked for this post
  40. #75
    Captain
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,671
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by danno View Post
    http://www.irishtimes.com/news/irela...anes-1.2914983

    Regardless of ATC--Crewing etc 24/7 cover is not guaranteed.
    Yes, I'm not *entirely* sure that highlighting that the two CASA's were grounded for four weeks while components were removed, sent to Spain, fixed and then returned - instead of insisting that replacement parts were sent out from Spain is helping the the PR effort...

    The fact remains that either the AC knew it would be required to generate an aircraft and did nothing about it for 3 hours, and then when it tried it took them 3 hours to find a qualified crew, or it took them 6 hours to find a qualified crew.

    Which of those alternatives do you find more comforting?

  41. Likes na grohmití, Sluggie liked this post
    Dislikes Jack Booted Man disliked this post

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •