MRV is AML 90 replacement, could do with a few more but there won't be another vehicle type purchased especially after the LTAV disasterI would have been hoping that Extra Force Protection might refer to an AML90/Scorpion replacement
Thanks: 12
Likes: 22
Dislikes: 1
MRV is AML 90 replacement, could do with a few more but there won't be another vehicle type purchased especially after the LTAV disasterI would have been hoping that Extra Force Protection might refer to an AML90/Scorpion replacement
Just visiting
DeV thanked for this post
It seems to spend most of its life on the back of a recovery vehicle
hptmurphy liked this post
Queens of the garage.
Well, there's good news and bad news. The bad news is that Neil will be taking over both branches, and some of you will lose your jobs. Those of you who are kept on will have to relocate to Swindon, if you wanna stay. I know, gutting. On a more positive note, the good news is, I've been promoted, so... every cloud. You're still thinking about the bad news aren't you?
hptmurphy liked this post
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/poli...raft-1.3251330body armour for troops.
So the somewhat disliked current BA is going bye bye?
"Let us be clear about three facts:First of all.All battles and all wars are won in the end by the Infantryman.Secondly the Infantryman bears the brunt of the fighting,his casualties are heavier and he suffers greater extremes of fatigue and discomfort than the other arms.Thirdly,the art of the Infantryman is less stereotyped and harder to acquire than that of any other arm".
-- Field Marshall Earl Wavell.1948
DeV liked this post
Seems that they are carried more than driven, to the degree they rarely get brought out and hence are quite unpopular, but then again the whole concept of LTAV seems to have come full circle, being too small ( crew wise ) to be effective unless deployed as part of a bigger group and given we have relatively a small amount or a largely unreliable vehicle they have no real role. But.. and a big but... the AMLs both 60s and 90s tended to be hanger queens unless used regularly and only really became reliable when the engine changes came about in the latter days of their lives...so don't give up on the LTAVs just yet!
Just visiting
yep, just like aircraft; use them or lose them.
hptmurphy liked this post
Wrt LTAV, worth having a look to see what others are replacing the type with. Humvee replacement being a prime example.
Well, there's good news and bad news. The bad news is that Neil will be taking over both branches, and some of you will lose your jobs. Those of you who are kept on will have to relocate to Swindon, if you wanna stay. I know, gutting. On a more positive note, the good news is, I've been promoted, so... every cloud. You're still thinking about the bad news aren't you?
Appears our problems with vehicles in the LTAV class aren't completely unique anyway:
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-41431507
Wonder what the lads in the BA think of them generally
Basically the entire generation of ltav (panther, eagle iv, etc) had massive problems. There are plans for more, hopefully when the jltv will be availablefor export.
smegers disliked this post
so is it electronics failing to cope with Irish rain? what's breaking down on them?
hptmurphy thanked for this post
I've a little bit of experience of Foxhound.
I think its a good bit of kit...offers great mobility and protection especially in an urban environment...but also has good cross-country capabilities.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-34498998
If that had been SNATCH... IMHO they'd have all been killed or VSI.
Foxhound is also much less intimidating and more manoeuvrable than MRAPS or Bushmaster.
Being careful about what I say...its biggest issue has been overheating (already open source) in hot and dusty places...but that is being addressed.
Its also quite maintenance intensive generally.
Apart from that its quite liked by those who crew it...my main criticism of Foxhound is that there is no proper protection for the top-cover sentries...ie no coupla.
I'm not sure why it was designed without one...possibly to do with height / weight / centre of gravity etc...more likely to save money.
'History is a vast early warning system'. Norman Cousins
spider thanked for this post
i thought the belief was that the gunner would probably be projected out of an IED-striking vehicle instead of being trapped and crushed by a rollover...
terrier liked this post
Back from annual leave. Any idea of the cap-ex framework for 2018, is it ship and APC refurb ?
"Are they trying to shoot down the other drone? "
"No, they're trying to fly the tank"
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)