Thanks Thanks:  5
Likes Likes:  11
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 16 of 16
  1. #1
    Private 3*
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    37
    Post Thanks / Like

    Plate Carrier Trials???

    Anyone have any info on the current plate carrier Trials that seem to be on going 😊😊😊

    IMG-20181201-WA0008.jpg

    IMG-20181201-WA0009.jpg

  2. Likes Rhodes, sofa liked this post
  3. #2
    Moderator DeV's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    East
    Posts
    21,288
    Post Thanks / Like
    Correct me if I’m wrong but plate carriers don’t have side armour?

  4. #3
    Private 3*
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    37
    Post Thanks / Like
    Pretty sure some do and some don't? Depends on the design? Then again I'm not 100% certain of my terminology.

    Would be a welcome upgrade from the flacker bv combo 👍

  5. #4
    Commander in Chief apod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Ass in the grass.
    Posts
    5,078
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Wiggles View Post
    Anyone have any info on the current plate carrier Trials that seem to be on going 😊😊😊

    IMG-20181201-WA0008.jpg

    IMG-20181201-WA0009.jpg
    Yeah. There's a trial.And it's going on.
    Seriously though. The current GSBA is coming to the end of it's service life and a new scalable body armour has been recommended. It is NOT a plate carrier. Plate carriers provide zero protection from Frag. Only rounds. We need protection from both.Thats why soft armour(kevlar/aramid) will remain part of the ensemble.
    Last edited by apod; 2nd December 2018 at 19:09.
    Infantry Corps - An Lámh Comhrac


    "Let us be clear about three facts:First of all.All battles and all wars are won in the end by the Infantryman.Secondly the Infantryman bears the brunt of the fighting,his casualties are heavier and he suffers greater extremes of fatigue and discomfort than the other arms.Thirdly,the art of the Infantryman is less stereotyped and harder to acquire than that of any other arm".
    -- Field Marshall Earl Wavell.1948

  6. Thanks DeV thanked for this post
    Likes DeV liked this post
  7. #5
    Private 3*
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    37
    Post Thanks / Like
    So what do we call it? I've always just referred to any modular tactical vest that held plates as a plate carrier 😂 I mean isn't the point that you can can set them up how you like (are told) soft armour only, plates only, both? 🤷🤷🤷

    Also, do you reckon this will be combat arm only issue?

  8. #6
    Commander in Chief apod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Ass in the grass.
    Posts
    5,078
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Wiggles View Post
    So what do we call it? I've always just referred to any modular tactical vest that held plates as a plate carrier 😂 I mean isn't the point that you can can set them up how you like (are told) soft armour only, plates only, both? 🤷🤷🤷

    Also, do you reckon this will be combat arm only issue?
    IMBAS is going to be the offiical term. Integrated Modular Body Armour System. To clarify. A plate carrier only holds plates.No soft armour.You can't add soft armour to it. Only plates. The new system will have both.

    BTW. Check PM's.
    Infantry Corps - An Lámh Comhrac


    "Let us be clear about three facts:First of all.All battles and all wars are won in the end by the Infantryman.Secondly the Infantryman bears the brunt of the fighting,his casualties are heavier and he suffers greater extremes of fatigue and discomfort than the other arms.Thirdly,the art of the Infantryman is less stereotyped and harder to acquire than that of any other arm".
    -- Field Marshall Earl Wavell.1948

  9. Thanks DeV thanked for this post
    Likes DeV liked this post
  10. #7
    Commander in Chief apod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Ass in the grass.
    Posts
    5,078
    Post Thanks / Like
    This link might help to clarify.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmplHBriG38&t=200s
    Infantry Corps - An Lámh Comhrac


    "Let us be clear about three facts:First of all.All battles and all wars are won in the end by the Infantryman.Secondly the Infantryman bears the brunt of the fighting,his casualties are heavier and he suffers greater extremes of fatigue and discomfort than the other arms.Thirdly,the art of the Infantryman is less stereotyped and harder to acquire than that of any other arm".
    -- Field Marshall Earl Wavell.1948

  11. Thanks na grohmití thanked for this post
  12. #8
    Lt General
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    4,352
    Post Thanks / Like
    My understanding (and I am open to correction) is that the plate carrier is more useful to those in exposed positions who do not require mobility, such as turret operators of afvs, crew of recce vehicles, military helicopters etc.
    German 1: Private Schnutz, I have bad news for you.
    German 2: Private? I am a general!
    German 1: That is the bad news.

  13. #9
    Commander in Chief apod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Ass in the grass.
    Posts
    5,078
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by na grohmití View Post
    My understanding (and I am open to correction) is that the plate carrier is more useful to those in exposed positions who do not require mobility, such as turret operators of afvs, crew of recce vehicles, military helicopters etc.
    Yes.And no.
    AFV crews may still need soft armour depending on the threat level and spall protection provided by their vehicle.
    Infantry may use just a plate carrier or downscale their modular system if the main threat is HV rounds and when the wearing of full up protection is impractical.
    A good example would be the troops operating in the steep mountains of the Korengal valley in Afghanistan(main threat HV) as opposed to the valley floors and the desert tracks of Helmand(Main threat IED's AND HV).
    Infantry Corps - An Lámh Comhrac


    "Let us be clear about three facts:First of all.All battles and all wars are won in the end by the Infantryman.Secondly the Infantryman bears the brunt of the fighting,his casualties are heavier and he suffers greater extremes of fatigue and discomfort than the other arms.Thirdly,the art of the Infantryman is less stereotyped and harder to acquire than that of any other arm".
    -- Field Marshall Earl Wavell.1948

  14. Thanks na grohmití, EUFighter thanked for this post
  15. #10
    Private 2*
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    19
    Post Thanks / Like
    having a look at the plate carriers, you attach the removable pouches to the carrier directly and dont use the gs vest anymore?
    Also it seems to have less coverage over the shoulders and under the arms but its probably a weight and speed tradeoff?

  16. #11
    Moderator DeV's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    East
    Posts
    21,288
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Exile View Post
    having a look at the plate carriers, you attach the removable pouches to the carrier directly and dont use the gs vest anymore?
    Also it seems to have less coverage over the shoulders and under the arms but its probably a weight and speed tradeoff?
    Correct as you always wear body armour

    More supportive of weapon

  17. #12
    Chief Casey Ryback
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,008
    Post Thanks / Like
    Jasus , I thought a plate carrier was a mess steward .
    Don't spit in my Bouillabaisse .

  18. Likes apod, EUFighter, CTU, DeV, na grohmití, Flamingo, Shaqra liked this post
  19. #13
    Lieutenant X-RayOne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    dublin
    Posts
    1,309
    Post Thanks / Like
    From the two photos.....am I right in saying 5 types on trial??

    A couple look fairly bulky just as is, minus pouches, and possibly plates? Would there be much added mobility, weight savings over current set up...?

    The two options in multicam pattern look neatest.
    The people of England have been led in Mesopotamia into a trap from which it will be hard to escape with dignity and honour. They have been tricked into it by a steady withholding of information. The Baghdad communiqus are belated, insincere, incomplete.....It is a disgrace to our imperial record, and may soon be too inflamed for any ordinary cure.We are to-day not far from a disaster.

    T.E. Lawrence, 2 Aug 1920.

  20. #14
    Commander in Chief apod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Ass in the grass.
    Posts
    5,078
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by X-RayOne View Post
    From the two photos.....am I right in saying 5 types on trial??

    A couple look fairly bulky just as is, minus pouches, and possibly plates? Would there be much added mobility, weight savings over current set up...?

    The two options in multicam pattern look neatest.
    Looks like it.

    Two options from Safariland. One Aussie TBAS(Please ,please,please ,god let us get this one) an Offering from First Spear and an unknown.

    As for bulk I guess that's all relative.Bulkier than the current offering with fixed neck protection and groin panel and the BV over the top?
    Infantry Corps - An Lámh Comhrac


    "Let us be clear about three facts:First of all.All battles and all wars are won in the end by the Infantryman.Secondly the Infantryman bears the brunt of the fighting,his casualties are heavier and he suffers greater extremes of fatigue and discomfort than the other arms.Thirdly,the art of the Infantryman is less stereotyped and harder to acquire than that of any other arm".
    -- Field Marshall Earl Wavell.1948

  21. #15
    Lieutenant X-RayOne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    dublin
    Posts
    1,309
    Post Thanks / Like
    It's a good opportunity to significantly lighten a fixed load troops have to carry and get the benefits of increased speed, agility and reduced weight stress.
    If these factors aren't the main considerations (take that sufficient ballistic protection is a given) somebody has taken eye off the ball.
    as to your point about current kit, yes absolutely must be lighter, slimmer than it. How much more is the key thing to maximize.
    The people of England have been led in Mesopotamia into a trap from which it will be hard to escape with dignity and honour. They have been tricked into it by a steady withholding of information. The Baghdad communiqus are belated, insincere, incomplete.....It is a disgrace to our imperial record, and may soon be too inflamed for any ordinary cure.We are to-day not far from a disaster.

    T.E. Lawrence, 2 Aug 1920.

  22. #16
    Commander in Chief apod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Ass in the grass.
    Posts
    5,078
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by X-RayOne View Post
    It's a good opportunity to significantly lighten a fixed load troops have to carry and get the benefits of increased speed, agility and reduced weight stress.
    If these factors aren't the main considerations (take that sufficient ballistic protection is a given) somebody has taken eye off the ball.
    as to your point about current kit, yes absolutely must be lighter, slimmer than it. How much more is the key thing to maximize.
    Have you read the review group report?
    Infantry Corps - An Lámh Comhrac


    "Let us be clear about three facts:First of all.All battles and all wars are won in the end by the Infantryman.Secondly the Infantryman bears the brunt of the fighting,his casualties are heavier and he suffers greater extremes of fatigue and discomfort than the other arms.Thirdly,the art of the Infantryman is less stereotyped and harder to acquire than that of any other arm".
    -- Field Marshall Earl Wavell.1948

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •