As an aside, if anyone else is shifting on an og jacket...
Thanks: 30
Likes: 134
Dislikes: 1
As an aside, if anyone else is shifting on an og jacket...
I knew a simple soldier boy.....
Who grinned at life in empty joy,
Slept soundly through the lonesome dark,
And whistled early with the lark.
In winter trenches, cowed and glum,
With crumps and lice and lack of rum,
He put a bullet through his brain.
And no one spoke of him again.
You smug-faced crowds with kindling eye
Who cheer when soldier lads march by,
Sneak home and pray you'll never know
The hell where youth and laughter go.
Ha...finally I can get a new Bush Hat!!!! In all seriousness though, they must have a deal with the DF, or have made slight changes to the pattern to get around copyright. Hell, the DF may even be allowing them to do this, Irish DPM is popular with the airsoft community and others, allowing arktis to license the pattern and produce it might keep some of the official stuff from popping up on Ebay.
What are you cackling at, fatty? Too much pie, that's your problem.
There's another thread here somewhere - I think it was said that: Arktis designed the original Irish DPM gear and after the first batch, DoD went with a cheaper supplier, but some(?) of the gear for the sniper teams is still sourced from Arktis.
Have a civvy smock from them, built like a tank and will probably outlast me.
The material can only be procured by the DF
You probably ought to talk to Nike, they mustn't be aware that there's a simple, cheap way of getting Chinese factories to stop ripping them off.
So, this Defence Act, the one doesn't apply to companies who aren't in Ireland - like, for example, Arktis - tell me about it....
No but copyright law would apply and contract law (depending on the contract they signed). Also the defence acts would make it illegal for them to export goods to this country as well as making it illegal for someone in this country from buying them.
Also please refrain from personal insults when you reply to this.
DeV liked this post
Arktis supplied the ARW with their smocks and trousers circa 1995.
We designed the pattern and I believe paid Arktis a fee for use of their clothing design.
Portwest in Mayo and Seyntex in Belgium produced the first items for issue in 1999.
Arktis continue to manufacture specialist items for us.
Both Seyntex and Arktis have been known for selling off surplus items AND Seyntex has sold off surplus material.
"Let us be clear about three facts:First of all.All battles and all wars are won in the end by the Infantryman.Secondly the Infantryman bears the brunt of the fighting,his casualties are heavier and he suffers greater extremes of fatigue and discomfort than the other arms.Thirdly,the art of the Infantryman is less stereotyped and harder to acquire than that of any other arm".
-- Field Marshall Earl Wavell.1948
Is the term "Irish DPM" copyrighted? As for the pattern itself, Crye haven't had much luck protecting theirs - the Brits and Yanks sidestepped royalties by making a very minor alteration to the pattern and the makers have avoided any repercussions from Crye: http://www.thefashionlaw.com/home/us...-army-supplier
And as for all the Chinese copies...
So if there's even a minute difference between what Arktis are selling and the official pattern, I think DoD would have a very hard time doing anything about it.
"Well, stone me! We've had cocaine, bribery and Arsenal scoring two goals at home. But just when you thought there were truly no surprises left in football, Vinnie Jones turns out to be an international player!" (Jimmy Greaves)!"
Well, there's good news and bad news. The bad news is that Neil will be taking over both branches, and some of you will lose your jobs. Those of you who are kept on will have to relocate to Swindon, if you wanna stay. I know, gutting. On a more positive note, the good news is, I've been promoted, so... every cloud. You're still thinking about the bad news aren't you?
Quite the opposite.The yanks got Crye to develop their Scorpion pattern.When the numpties that be decided to go with UCP Crye took the scorpion pattern,tweaked it, and sold it as Multicam. The yanks owned the original pattern.When they decided to ditch UCP and OEF pattern and go to OCP(scorpion w2)they made minor changes to stop Crye from claiming that they were copying Multicam.Crye haven't had much luck protecting theirs - the Brits and Yanks sidestepped royalties by making a very minor alteration to the pattern
The Brits had to pay for a licence to produce their DPM blended with Cryes Multicam as MTP. Hence the reason that in the early days of MTP it could not be got commercially.The licence has expired now.
"Let us be clear about three facts:First of all.All battles and all wars are won in the end by the Infantryman.Secondly the Infantryman bears the brunt of the fighting,his casualties are heavier and he suffers greater extremes of fatigue and discomfort than the other arms.Thirdly,the art of the Infantryman is less stereotyped and harder to acquire than that of any other arm".
-- Field Marshall Earl Wavell.1948
sofa liked this post
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)