And ever since theres been constant air to ground firing, helis, both green and red white, using the airfield for training. the base is a massive asset and should be used more, not less.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Maritime Patrol
Collapse
X
-
"He is an enemy officer taken in battle and entitled to fair treatment."
"No, sir. He's a sergeant, and they don't deserve no respect at all, sir. I should know. They're cunning and artful, if they're any good. I wouldn't mind if he was an officer, sir. But sergeants are clever."
- Likes 4
-
Originally posted by morpheus View PostF~**k them, theres been an airbase there since long before most houses in the area.For now, everything hangs on implementation of the CoDF report.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by The real Jack View PostOffers like that are nigh on impossible to accept for a government organisation unless the minister actually gives a **** about the department in question so the blame for it is firmly in the departmental/political domain.
Not so. The Air Corps (management both flying and support) did not want it because its instruments were not the same as 252/253. Thought it would confuse the poor pilots!!! They tried to make a case for a 3rd transport machine for the army, but they had no interest in one.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by client View PostNot so. The Air Corps (management both flying and support) did not want it because its instruments were not the same as 252/253. Thought it would confuse the poor pilots!!! They tried to make a case for a 3rd transport machine for the army, but they had no interest in one.
Comment
-
The DF parachuting rate went up because 250 had parachute cables running the length of the cabin so that static-line jumps (stand up, hook up) could be carried out and the Rangers and para display team loved it because they could group together on the ramp and jump out as a formation or, in the case of the Rangers, jump while festooned with equipment. I took part in several flights as ramp and door opener for both parties and they were delighted with it, especially because it got them away from jumping out of 172s or helicopters. It also meant that larger groups could go up on each flight, so the jumpers got more jumps, from higher and got to do all the specialised jump stuff that 172s or helicopters couldn't deal with. Apart from that, the cargo Casa was brilliant for air ambulance as you could lift a patient on a trolley and as much ancilliary kit and medical team personnel as you liked. The most I saw was six, plus the patient. It was infinitely better than the King air because 240 had no cargo door and you had to take off the hand rail to get a stretcher on board, which meant that the patient had to be lifted off the stretcher, the gear then loaded and the patient refitted to the stretcher, which was slow, inconvenient and stressful. With 250, you simply walked up the ramp. It literally took a few minutes to get a stretcher aboard and tied down. With 252/3, the ramp is/was fitted with the dinghy launcher and the mission equipment made it much harder to get a patient on board. Also, it meant that we could move a group of mechs, tools and parts (or anything else for that matter) easily to anywhere in the island or it could act as a support aircraft for Air Corps aircraft going abroad. It was routine to go to Dublin Airport to get the other aircraft that had diverted there because of fog in Baldonnel. We could go over with chocks, a towbar, tools, intake blanks and our own oils and greases and get the aircraft parked up or made ready for flight and all it took was a ten-minute flight from Baldonnel, instead of an hour and a half by road. It was so very handy to have a flying Transit Van and it even performed maritime missions very early on. It really made a difference and it was a real disappointment that it wasn't kept. It did most, if not all of the Cessna, King Air and some of the heli utility jobs, just on a modestly bigger scale. As for pilot training, alluded to above, it was not so dramatically different from 252/3 in the cockpit that any pilot couldn't fly either and it certainly didn't demand a different type rating.
- Likes 10
Comment
-
My apologies, my sarcastic tone does not reflect well in the media of print.
Returning 250 was a huge mistake, the justification given as per my post above, wich was mostly unconvincing. We had managed up to then with twin engined SKA200 with Mk1 eyeball, hand held camera and weather radar, and now we bemoan lack of sensors to justify returning an aircraft which was, in its standard state, still a huge step up from the SKA200.
I seem to remember they managed to squeeze an entire either Cessna 172 or a Warrior into the cargo hold, wings off, as a demonstration of its usefulness.For now, everything hangs on implementation of the CoDF report.
- Likes 3
Comment
Comment