Irish Military Online is in no way affiliated with the Irish Defence Forces. It is in no way sponsored or endorsed by the Irish Defence Forces or the Irish Government. Opinions expressed by the authors and contributors of this site are not necessarily those of the Defence Forces. If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
In the most recent issue of An Cosantoir, the writer of an article on the new 120mm mortar claims that a battery of same can put down as much hitting power as a battery of 155s.Pound for pound, there is a considerable difference in weight of shot, so how can he make such a claim?
regards
GttC
Playing devils advocate, mortar rounds tend to have thinner walls than artillery shells so if you go by the weight of the TNT in the round rather than the total weight of the round, the difference isn't as big.
A 120mm mortar round contains about 4.5kg and a 155 shell about 8kg. For a sustained burst of innaccurate fire, you could probably drop twice as many rounds into a mortar as quick as you would load and fire a 155 so he may be right. If you wanted to accurately re-lay every time, then the 155 would win every time.
I could be wrong but also he said that all the mortars and first allotment of ammo was purchased for the price of a single MOWAG,, but isnt the mowag 1million euros???:confused::confused: that contract was worth over 5 times that figure,,(check different thread for exact amount)
I could be wrong but also he said that all the mortars and first allotment of ammo was purchased for the price of a single MOWAG,, but isnt the mowag 1million euros??? that contract was worth over 5 times that figure,,(check different thread for exact amount)
That person was talking about the mortars themselves.
Cos of the trajectory of the rounds at conventional ranges, the 120 is coming in at a higher angle, therefore its burst is more circular than the 155 at low angle, giving it a more even and potentially more lethal splinter distance. The major drawback is in the flexibility of the round in terms of variations such as bomblet (stunning in effect). Mobility is also an issue. Coupled with the fact that WE DON'T HAVE 155s! So in real terms, bring em on!
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment