Originally posted by GoneToTheCanner
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Drivers Course
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by ZULU View PostWhen was driving not a military applicable skill?
Originally posted by Buck View PostI think it would be a better way, to have everyone at least familiar with the DF basic vehicles: nissan/pajero, transit!
it would cost money though, clearly not a runner in the foreseeable future...
Originally posted by GoneToTheCanner View PostHi Buck,
Given the cost of basic training already, a few quid on getting a guy cleared to drive is hardly a waste of funds,
Those of us that have done the driving course know what a protracted course it is.
Is there really 35 spare hours in the recruit training program to teach mod 1 of the driving course and 6 weeks to teach mod 2.
thats 6 weeks full time not rdf time!!!!
so forget about the cost, the question still remains, why distract from military training?
Yes Zulu people drive in the army but it is not a military skill.
if you don't believe me ask the billions of non military personnel around the world that drive professionally.
trucks are trucks
DROPS are glorified skip trucks.
And although I have never been in one, I have been told that a tank is no more difficult to drive than a Hymac.Without supplies no army is brave.
—Frederick the Great,
Instructions to his Generals, 1747
Comment
-
luchi - where are you going with your 6 weeks?
you can pass your test in just over a week (or equivalent hours) usually and get your Full Licence.
then it's just a matter of 'conversion' onto the vehicles concerned when they get to their unit.
some of our vehicles would take a week or more but your Land Rovers etc can be done in a couple of days, as can cross country driving.
there is room in the training program as some of the lessons are slipped back into the evenings.
the system works - turning out well trained recruits who can all drive.
every soldier should be able to drive legally.
Comment
-
That isn't the way the DF or civilian licence works.
Due to the PC crowd evening training is restricted
Remember not everyone even has a provisional licence when they join, diesel and FWT cost money... money the DF doesn't have
It is a vital skill even in the RDF
Comment
-
Originally posted by RoyalGreenJacket View Postluchi - where are you going with your 6 weeks?
1 week is given to theory.
5 weeks to basic driving skills, ie small vehicles and includes 1 day of off road.
1 week for minibus conversion.
thats the way it is.
you can pass your test in just over a week (or equivalent hours) usually and get your Full Licence.
then it's just a matter of 'conversion' onto the vehicles concerned when they get to their unit.
every soldier should be able to drive legally.
All it needs is the right officer to sign the right papers and bingo!!
But little empires and PCness prevent this.
Dev:
I don't disagree that driving is a useful skill but vital???Without supplies no army is brave.
—Frederick the Great,
Instructions to his Generals, 1747
Comment
-
In the UK, it was possible (in civilian life) to go from provisional motorcycle licence, with no experience at all, to Test in 3 intensive days.
The law changed to prevent block booking of tests some years ago, but there was a very high success rate.
Catch-22 says they have a right to do anything we can't stop them from doing.
Comment
-
the main aim of recruit traiing is to turn civvies into Soldiers
in recruit training they learn the very very basics of Soldiering- when they get to their units they
learn the rest- UNits are crying out for new Soldiers- the time set out for recruit training is already to long.
rooting tooting and shooting is the only thing that should be done as recruits- they dont have the time
to learn unncesseary skills such as driving and identification of flaura and fauna.
when a lad gets to his unit and he has a reasonable grasp of his basic skill sets- then and only then
should he be considered for the likes of driver training-
I agree that every Soldier should know how to drive-Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere***
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.
Comment
-
This driving story has been flogged to death. The simple truth is that there is "an empire" to be protected, full stop.
Here is a good example:
We have a 3x who is a qualified HGV mechanic. For his job he holds all catogaries on his driving licence. They made him do Module 1 (granted he had to do DSOs). Then they wanted him to do Module 2. Only for a PDF officer, who came up through the ranks, pleaded his case over a period of time with the highest authority possible, was he allowed to be tested in a TCV 4x4 and thereby avoid a charade. This is the only case of "real world thinking" that I can recall in a long time as regards military transport.
Rather than teaching someone in a Nissan (too big, too powerful for a learner, too expensive, working vehicles tied up) the DF should invest in some 10 year old Micras/Yaris or simillar and the class B driving course could be done in a week. Also why can the DF not use the civi theory test? If it's good enough for Joe Public why not the DF?
All they have to do then is the DSOs and with a willing and interested student it would take two days max.I'm not a number, I'm a free man.
Who is number 1?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Goldie fish View PostIn the UK, it was possible ..............
Originally posted by hedgehog View Postthe main aim of recruit traiing is to turn civvies into Soldiers
.......
they dont have the time
to learn unncesseary skills such as driving and identification of flaura and fauna.
when a lad gets to his unit and he has a reasonable grasp of his basic skill sets- then and only then
Originally posted by The Prisoner View PostThis driving story has been flogged to death. The simple truth is that there is "an empire" to be protected, full stop.
Rather than teaching someone in a Nissan (too big, too powerful for a learner, too expensive, working vehicles tied up) the DF should invest in some 10 year old Micras/Yaris or simillar and the class B driving course could be done in a week. Also why can the DF not use the civi theory test? If it's good enough for Joe Public why not the DF?
All they have to do then is the DSOs and with a willing and interested student it would take two days max.Without supplies no army is brave.
—Frederick the Great,
Instructions to his Generals, 1747
Comment
-
Originally posted by luchi View PostDev:
I don't disagree that driving is a useful skill but vital???
The rules aren't just there to keep people on courses, they are also there to ensure drivers are safe. But I do agree there should be some changes.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hedgehog View Post...when a lad gets to his unit and he has a reasonable grasp of his basic skill sets- then and only then should he be considered for the likes of driver training'...
we don't always have that luxury Hedge - look at the likes of Keef - he will be straight out of training and into Helmand, he has only been in basic training a couple of months and is on the way to gaining his Full UK Driving Licence courtesy of the Army.
driving is not just a nice thing to have or a cushty course to go on after operations - its for operations that you need it most.
sometimes being able to drive in a hostile situation may be the difference between life and death - that's why all of our soldiers now (generally) join their units already able to drive.Last edited by RoyalGreenJacket; 14 May 2010, 19:00.
Comment
-
Are you saying that you send a lad on operations straight from training-
Here you have to be a year in the DF before you can travel
but I suppose both Armies are different
But I would have really thought that 2-3 weeks out of recruit training would have been
much better spent learning the basicsThings fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere***
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hedgehog View PostAre you saying that you send a lad on operations straight from training
there is not much he will learn sat in a barracks for a year at home that he won't soon learn out on patrol with other soldiers, besides we don't have the option to leave troops at home (except a Rear Party) as we send formed Battalions / Battle Groups - when his battalion goes - he goes.
driving is an excellent skill to have under his belt when he is out there.
granted, it used to be something usually left until reaching his unit (particularly in the Infantry) but other arms have been producing fully trained soldiers who can drive for the Army when they reach their units and now it's virtually Army wide.
so i say yes - train them as soldiers who can also drive, particularly in the Irish DF where you have a smaller pool of manpower, you need more people with many varied skills.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DeV View PostHave a look at CS4 and see how many drivers are supposed to be in an infantry battalion (and not all get tech pay so aren't listed). In a mortar crew 1 is the driver yet they are all supposed to be able to do everyones job?!.
The rules aren't just there to keep people on courses, they are also there to ensure drivers are safe.
And ensure others have the job to instruct them.
But please to "ensure safety"
A simple assessment is all that is required.
But I do agree there should be some changesWithout supplies no army is brave.
—Frederick the Great,
Instructions to his Generals, 1747
Comment
Comment