Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Plate Carrier Trials???

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • X-RayOne
    replied
    Nope. But enlighten us with the bullet point recommendations please.

    Leave a comment:


  • apod
    replied
    Originally posted by X-RayOne View Post
    It's a good opportunity to significantly lighten a fixed load troops have to carry and get the benefits of increased speed, agility and reduced weight stress.
    If these factors aren't the main considerations (take that sufficient ballistic protection is a given) somebody has taken eye off the ball.
    as to your point about current kit, yes absolutely must be lighter, slimmer than it. How much more is the key thing to maximize.
    Have you read the review group report?

    Leave a comment:


  • X-RayOne
    replied
    It's a good opportunity to significantly lighten a fixed load troops have to carry and get the benefits of increased speed, agility and reduced weight stress.
    If these factors aren't the main considerations (take that sufficient ballistic protection is a given) somebody has taken eye off the ball.
    as to your point about current kit, yes absolutely must be lighter, slimmer than it. How much more is the key thing to maximize.

    Leave a comment:


  • apod
    replied
    Originally posted by X-RayOne View Post
    From the two photos.....am I right in saying 5 types on trial??

    A couple look fairly bulky just as is, minus pouches, and possibly plates? Would there be much added mobility, weight savings over current set up...?

    The two options in multicam pattern look neatest.
    Looks like it.

    Two options from Safariland. One Aussie TBAS(Please ,please,please ,god let us get this one) an Offering from First Spear and an unknown.

    As for bulk I guess that's all relative.Bulkier than the current offering with fixed neck protection and groin panel and the BV over the top?

    Leave a comment:


  • X-RayOne
    replied
    From the two photos.....am I right in saying 5 types on trial??

    A couple look fairly bulky just as is, minus pouches, and possibly plates? Would there be much added mobility, weight savings over current set up...?

    The two options in multicam pattern look neatest.

    Leave a comment:


  • Laners
    replied
    Jasus , I thought a plate carrier was a mess steward .

    Leave a comment:


  • DeV
    replied
    Originally posted by Exile View Post
    having a look at the plate carriers, you attach the removable pouches to the carrier directly and dont use the gs vest anymore?
    Also it seems to have less coverage over the shoulders and under the arms but its probably a weight and speed tradeoff?
    Correct as you always wear body armour

    More supportive of weapon

    Leave a comment:


  • Exile
    replied
    having a look at the plate carriers, you attach the removable pouches to the carrier directly and dont use the gs vest anymore?
    Also it seems to have less coverage over the shoulders and under the arms but its probably a weight and speed tradeoff?

    Leave a comment:


  • apod
    replied
    Originally posted by na grohmití View Post
    My understanding (and I am open to correction) is that the plate carrier is more useful to those in exposed positions who do not require mobility, such as turret operators of afvs, crew of recce vehicles, military helicopters etc.
    Yes.And no.
    AFV crews may still need soft armour depending on the threat level and spall protection provided by their vehicle.
    Infantry may use just a plate carrier or downscale their modular system if the main threat is HV rounds and when the wearing of full up protection is impractical.
    A good example would be the troops operating in the steep mountains of the Korengal valley in Afghanistan(main threat HV) as opposed to the valley floors and the desert tracks of Helmand(Main threat IED's AND HV).

    Leave a comment:


  • na grohmiti
    replied
    My understanding (and I am open to correction) is that the plate carrier is more useful to those in exposed positions who do not require mobility, such as turret operators of afvs, crew of recce vehicles, military helicopters etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • apod
    replied
    This link might help to clarify.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmplHBriG38&t=200s

    Leave a comment:


  • apod
    replied
    Originally posted by Wiggles View Post
    So what do we call it? I've always just referred to any modular tactical vest that held plates as a plate carrier 😂 I mean isn't the point that you can can set them up how you like (are told) soft armour only, plates only, both? 🤷🤷🤷

    Also, do you reckon this will be combat arm only issue?
    IMBAS is going to be the offiical term. Integrated Modular Body Armour System. To clarify. A plate carrier only holds plates.No soft armour.You can't add soft armour to it. Only plates. The new system will have both.

    BTW. Check PM's.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wiggles
    replied
    So what do we call it? I've always just referred to any modular tactical vest that held plates as a plate carrier 😂 I mean isn't the point that you can can set them up how you like (are told) soft armour only, plates only, both? 🤷🤷🤷

    Also, do you reckon this will be combat arm only issue?

    Leave a comment:


  • apod
    replied
    Originally posted by Wiggles View Post
    Anyone have any info on the current plate carrier Trials that seem to be on going 😊😊😊

    [ATTACH]8610[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH]8611[/ATTACH]
    Yeah. There's a trial.And it's going on.
    Seriously though. The current GSBA is coming to the end of it's service life and a new scalable body armour has been recommended. It is NOT a plate carrier. Plate carriers provide zero protection from Frag. Only rounds. We need protection from both.Thats why soft armour(kevlar/aramid) will remain part of the ensemble.
    Last edited by apod; 2 December 2018, 18:09.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wiggles
    replied
    Pretty sure some do and some don't? Depends on the design? Then again I'm not 100% certain of my terminology.

    Would be a welcome upgrade from the flacker bv combo 👍

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X