Originally posted by trellheim
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Defence Forces Combat Clothing System
Collapse
X
-
What do folks think of the current smock? Have not gotten issued one yet, but still scratch my head as to why the inside of the collar is fleece lined. Looks shite when not fully closed up"Well, stone me! We've had cocaine, bribery and Arsenal scoring two goals at home. But just when you thought there were truly no surprises left in football, Vinnie Jones turns out to be an international player!" (Jimmy Greaves)!"
Comment
-
Originally posted by Truck Driver View PostWhat do folks think of the current smock? Have not gotten issued one yet, but still scratch my head as to why the inside of the collar is fleece lined. Looks shite when not fully closed up
i assume the fleece bit is to prevent irritation?
Comment
-
Yes for the fleece.....common on a lot of higher quality mountaineering hardshell rain jackets. More comfy against the neck / chin. Particualry if zipper or face material in contact with skin.
Personally hated the previous hood... was just bulky and uncomfortable when rolled up. Better to have a detachable version. But equally why have a hood? Between neck gaitor/ shemagh/headover (whatever your flavour!) fleeve cap and helmet whats the need? If its lashing rain put on your wet gear and hood up.An army is power. Its entire purpose is to coerce others. This power can not be used carelessly or recklessly. This power can do great harm. We have seen more suffering than any man should ever see, and if there is going to be an end to it, it must be an end that justifies the cost. Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by na grohmiti View Post
The final point is a particular with a Northern Ireland based uniform supplier. I got 2 shirts the same size from them on one occasion. When I laid one on top of the other there was an extra inch of fabric outlining the smaller of the 2. Same goes for hat sizes, I've worn hats at work or in the DF for the bones of 35 years, yet their 59 was too big for me, and their 58 sat too high on my head. If they win the tender the cut and pattern should remain unchanged for the duration of that contract, with no exceptions.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by northie View Post
If memory serves correctly, then the same company were disqualified from the Nordic Combat Uniform trials as their garment failed to meet waterproofing standards after a number of wash cycles."Let us be clear about three facts. First, all battles and all wars are won in the end by the infantryman. Secondly, the infantryman always bears the brunt. His casualties are heavier, he suffers greater extremes of discomfort and fatigue than the other arms. Thirdly, the art of the infantryman is less stereotyped and far harder to acquire in modern war than that of any other arm." ------- Field Marshall Wavell, April 1945.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
D Ord came and presented to RDF ORA officers day saturday last and gave an honest brief with samples . Looks good . That sizing thing "Get measured" I think is a good idea fairy job .... Had to change out too many pieces of kit down the years for people . That's process though - but the uniform looks the right way to go"Are they trying to shoot down the other drone? "
"No, they're trying to fly the tank"
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by trellheim View PostD Ord came and presented to RDF ORA officers day saturday last and gave an honest brief with samples . Looks good . That sizing thing "Get measured" I think is a good idea fairy job .... Had to change out too many pieces of kit down the years for people . That's process though - but the uniform looks the right way to go
Why are we again trying to reinvent the wheel when an established international system for Military clothing already exists?What are you cackling at, fatty? Too much pie, that's your problem.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
SSD piece on new camo
Will the NS have to make a new Interior Ministry Camo to keep up?Although the pattern has been kept under wraps, photos have recently been made public of the new Defence Forces camouflage pattern which will soon replace the four-color DPM, in service since 2000. Although called Disruptive Pattern Material, like the old British national pattern, the two patterns don't resemble one another. In Irish, the Defence ForcesEveryone who's ever loved you was wrong.
Comment
Comment