Do LSB units still have a PDF C.O?
Catch-22 says they have a right to do anything we can't stop them from doing.
I'm fairly sure that my unit is the only reserve COE unit with RDF Comdt.
AD are the same, battery commander is an RDF Comdt, no PDF in our unit bar a cadre sgt and gnr.
"Attack your attic with a Steyr....as seen on the Late Late Show..."
The only units that have PDF COs are Inf Bns, FARs & the LSBs (CO of the RLSB is the 2ic of the PDF LSB I think).
The 4 Lt Colonels are the EOs (Executive Officers (2ICs) of the Brigades, answering to the OC Bde RDF.
RDF sub-unit / unit commanders are expect (as they always should) to take responsibility for their units.
Not sure this time! There are still a lot of part-time jobs out there and a lot more people looking for them! Also people will be putting more effort in a job to make sure they still have a job!On the other hand history will show that during times of rescession that attendance and commitment to the RDF increases.
Yep, sorry, got distracted there and submitted my post. :redface: I was meaning to ask, what rank are other RDF sub-unit commanders? I assume they're commandants but isn't a sub-unit commander generally a captain?
"Attack your attic with a Steyr....as seen on the Late Late Show..."
yes but he's the ADR commander.Lt Col..... the only fully integrated unit in the DF! whatever docman says!!!!!
Pussyand Gunsmoke.......live by one, die by the other, and love the smell of both in the morning!!
In the Army Reserve
Major units - Infantry Battalions, Fd Arty Regts & LSBs - Commanded by PDF Commandants (title is Commanding Officer (CO))
Minor units - all other corps units and sub-units (ie companies/batteries within major units) Commanded by RDF Commandants (title is Officer Commanding (O/C))
In comparsion PDF major units are commanded by Lt Colonels.
Last edited by Boomer; 3rd February 2009 at 11:29. Reason: slightly risky language
But there's no danger
It's a professional career
Though it could be arranged
With just a word in Mr. Churchill's ear
If you're out of luck you're out of work
We could send you to johannesburg.
(Elvis Costello, Olivers Army)
Something that needs to be addressed is accountability, for all ranks. Time and time again troops don't turn up when they say they will and there is very little done about it.
These same people are then taken along on tactical weekends or full time training and consequently everyone is held up while classes are re-done. Not only are the dedicated people getting less training, they're sitting through a lecture they've already given up their time to attend when they could be off doing what they actually turned up for. This is also completely frustrating for instructors too - if I've made an effort to put together a class, why should I have to give it again for those who only show up when they're getting paid for it???
The RDF will never do anything more than it does now unless it radically improves it's professionallism across the board. There are excellent reservists around but as an organisation this is sorely lacking.
Some things which may (or may not) be beneficial
- Ensure that people know that when they agree to turn up, they do - or else. If they can't handle that then maybe they should reconsider being in a military organisation. Too many people get away with not bothering their arses and cosequently someone else has to pick up after them.
- Increase unit training - seven to eleven once a week and two field days a month instead of this pathetic half seven to 10. By the time parades are had and weapons taken to and from stores theres only time for 2 classes. In fact, make the 2 field days an overnight, get them into barracks and have a proper training weekend instead of this 'knock off at dinner time' malarky.
- Have units provide troops for barrack guards and stand-to's on a regular basis. Eg, they have to provide 2 bods once a fortnight or something. It's not CIT but it's a start.
- Someone said that PDF should conduct recruit and 2* training - I think that's an excellent idea and one which would really sort out the wasters, even if it was one or two PDF NCO's working alongside RDF instructors.
- Fitness tests for everyone. Period.
- Fitness test for recruits. There's about 4 months before they're sworn in, that time could be used to get them ready to pass a fitness test. I've said it before, it would probably mean recruitment takes a huge hit to begin but I believe if the RDF is taken seriously by the public then you'll get more dedicated people - as it is there are some good ones but how many bad ones. How many recruits are still there 2 years later? One in ten I reckon. And it's not always the good ones that stay.
- More time on the ground.
- More stringent TOET's - weapons handling is appalling.
To be honest, more of everything but a lot of what I've said is quite feasible if the will and support was there.
Last edited by concussion; 3rd February 2009 at 00:15.
"Attack your attic with a Steyr....as seen on the Late Late Show..."
good post concussion,
tbh i wouldnt be interested indoin CIT gaurd duties etc, but if it was the price to pay to get an improved reserve then i suppose it would be a small price to pay,
i know that Reservist in holland have done security at the port in rotterdam so its not somethin thats purely fantasy...
But there's no danger
It's a professional career
Though it could be arranged
With just a word in Mr. Churchill's ear
If you're out of luck you're out of work
We could send you to johannesburg.
(Elvis Costello, Olivers Army)
I agree with every point you made with the exception of the above. Where I'd agree that recruit training is nowhere near the general standard it should be, I think that the reserve is capable of mirroring the resulting standard of privates from PDF training. There are a number of points i could make here but i'll just make two;
Accountability - if you have a good CS, the Sgts will be kicked into shape, who in turn will kick the Cpls into shape, who in turn will make sure that they do their job properly, and train and maintain troops. If only one person in a weak link in this chain, they should be removed until they can do their job. In short, let's get rid of this half-arsed attitude to EVERYTHING. It's starting to happen in my unit, and the results are fantastic.
Fitness - Following on from above, make the CS responsible for the Sgts fitness, the Sgt for the Cpl, and the Cpl for the Ptes. Fitness is incrediby important, if only from a health and safety point of view.
Make the fatties run.
If they won't, make them crawl.
If they won't, make them swim.
If they won't, problem solved.
Amateurs built the ark. Professionals built the Titanic.
No, it is just you using anecdotal evidence.:wink:
Anecdotal evidence - well entire college courses are built around how to back up arguments. You can't write a serious college paper unless you can properly back it up.
Basically, your anecdotal evidence is that of merely 1 small part of the overall scenario. You have no idea what are the circumstances confronting the senior NCOs, officers, other Corps. It is easy, but unproductive, to make a judgement based on your own personal experiences with little or no knowledge of the overall situation.
As for being unable to back up an argument with nothing other than anecdotal evidence.... doesn't make for a argument that will last 5 mins against any type of scrutiny.
How do the PDF unit assessments & MREs work?
Saw a fantastic BA video around this very subject.
Must get a copy from the School
The driver ends up nodding at the wheel, colliding with an oncoming car, and the
consequences of the resulting court case.....
Should be mandatory viewing for all DF drivers before upcoming exercises
"Well, stone me! We've had cocaine, bribery and Arsenal scoring two goals at home. But just when you thought there were truly no surprises left in football, Vinnie Jones turns out to be an international player!" (Jimmy Greaves)!"
It should be mandatory viewing for all those detailing drivers (especially drivers that also have to undertake training as well as their detail).
To their door? (it shouldn't be transport is only supposed to be provided to unit locations or as detailed). Who drops the driver(s) home!?
Last edited by concussion; 3rd February 2009 at 12:33.
"Attack your attic with a Steyr....as seen on the Late Late Show..."
The problem again is that you will never,ever have the same class week after week. It's completely soul-destroying to go over the same thing again because people missed that class and it's vital for going to the range or whatever. Ideally (ha!) everyone should know that if you miss x class you don't fire. I know people have jobs and other commitments and there should be some lee-way of course, but this endless repition means no-one gets the training that they should. At the end of the day, if people can't commit to the RDF, why are they in it???
Prepare to be disappointedThe same stuff will happen. Yes, you'll get through the syllabus but keep an eye on how many classes are repeated in order to cater for everyone...
Last edited by concussion; 3rd February 2009 at 13:09.
"Attack your attic with a Steyr....as seen on the Late Late Show..."
everybody gets a full nights sleep on friday. On the saturday gpmg firing (not strenous) will be done till 3 after that revision of tactics dinner then a little bit more. from 7:00 after recieveing orders we will be on our own time to prepare route cards and the like (get rested etc). PNCOs might be coming but this is a test for NCOs before we start teaching night nav to the troops (though they have completed how lessons on how to "see" at night) we will finish around mid day then go home.Sleep deprivation, that serves no purpose other than to be seen as "hard" is pointless.
Docman the point I am trying to make is that if my officers can do it, therefore so can others even if there is a load of shit above them. BTW none of our coporals are drivers and it is these that are being tested. Any overnight ex we have done (are OCs stay on the ground with us BTW hear that isn't generally done) drivers are always properly rested.
Sleep depreviation is a face of a soldiers life!
You are obviously a lot better organised (and have the troops to do it quickly). Liking the idea of midday finish!!!
So the potential for accidents is still there. Statistically most accidents happen close to the destination.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)