Originally posted by ancientmariner
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
9 Ship Navy Included in Programme for Government!
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by danno View PostHow "historic" is the FMC in its current format-10-15 years? Whether it is sent to SFPA or is manned by civvies still allows trained NS bods to crew/naval duties.
Historic=something in the past.
SFPA need to start doing their own job properly before you start taking tasks from other agencies. Sort out the wexford gangsters for starters.For now, everything hangs on implementation of the CoDF report.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
I think you are confusing FMC with RMP, FMC only monitors a small cohort of traffic. In my experience most fishermen are cut from the same stick . There was an incident involving one of the Wexford trawlers with the NS and the NS withdrew when confronted by the trawlermen concerned. If the NS cant handle the punters how then can the SFPA be expected to face them down with nothing bigger than a rib armed with biros.
Comment
-
Originally posted by na grohmità View PostThat isn't their total remit. If SFPA regulated the markets, the end users better, there should be no illegal fish landings whatsoever. Leave the boarding to the NS. There are too many navies on this small isle.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by danno View PostThat is probably the best tactic giving the best outcome. As somebody posted here before, Mrs Murphy wants to buy her fish in a very presentable fresh & hygenic fashion from a reputable shop/monger, not from a hoodie behind the jacks in the car park. Intercepting the fish coming into and moving about the internal market is the best means of enforcement. Whilst uncaught the fish are the property of the EEC and let it chase the trawlers. If the trawlers cannot land/sell the illegal catch they will go out of business. There is ample space for the SFPA to deal with landbased matters leaving matters maritime to the INS.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by danno View PostI think you are confusing FMC with RMP, FMC only monitors a small cohort of traffic. In my experience most fishermen are cut from the same stick . There was an incident involving one of the Wexford trawlers with the NS and the NS withdrew when confronted by the trawlermen concerned. If the NS cant handle the punters how then can the SFPA be expected to face them down with nothing bigger than a rib armed with biros.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by ancientmariner View PostThe SFPA was founded most likely to tidy up the legal paths between Naval actions at sea, Gardai ,and the courts. The Navy work for the SFPA but do NOT arrest vessels but detain them on suspicion of a contravention. On advice of the DPP based on Naval Statements, the Gardai Arrest the Skipper of the detained vessel and he has his day in court. All vessels at sea above a minimal length 12/15m have a classification satellite transponder, any monitoring agency picks up ALL transmissions so that it knows Tankers, Liners, general cargo, trawlers, yachts, Military vessels from each other by colour and obviously motion. The FMC picture is as near Real Maritime Picture as it is possible to obtain other than vessels Switched off like ours or theirs?
Comment
-
Originally posted by DeV View PostThe RMP exists and has done for a number of years there is a lot more to it than the FV transponders and AIS
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by ancientmariner View PostIt exists for those with info from the Mil. satellites and the known undersea picture, perhaps FMC and RMP doesn't exactly describe Haulbowline's Centre, which might be bettered described as a Known Surface Picture Centre and Not just exclusively a Fishery Monitoring capable Centre.
Comment
Comment