Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

MOWAG replacement

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by DeV View Post
    Why are turrets so 1990s?
    space man

    Comment


    • wtf

      Comment


      • Originally posted by johnhan278 View Post
        wtf
        because the turret takes up so much space inside the vehicle it reduces the number of soldiers you can carry
        Last edited by apc; 19 October 2016, 17:49.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by apc View Post
          because the bussel takes up so much space inside the vehicle it reduces the number of soldiers you can carry
          But so does the RWS control suite and the gunner

          Maybe not to the same extend

          Comment


          • Originally posted by DeV View Post
            But so does the RWS control suite and the gunner

            Maybe not to the same extend
            Obiviously some space taken up. APCs "tend" to have RWS to give more space for troops

            Comment


            • Originally posted by apc View Post
              because the turret takes up so much space inside the vehicle it reduces the number of soldiers you can carry
              Plus, A turret stuffed inside would be very dangerous and not very practical.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by sofa View Post
                Plus, A turret stuffed inside would be very dangerous and not very practical.
                Keep it nice and clean though

                Comment


                • US Stryker upgrade - 30mm RWS

                  Today, after 18 months of urgent work, the Army rolled out its first upgunned Stryker vehicle, nicknamed Dragoon. The armored eight-wheel-drive troop transport, built by General Dynamics and normally armed with no more than a 0.50 calibre (12.7 millimeter) machinegun in an unprotected mount, has been rebuilt with an armored turret containing a 30 mm…


                  Today, after 18 months of urgent work, the Army rolled out its first upgunned Stryker vehicle, nicknamed Dragoon. The armored eight-wheel-drive troop transport, built by General Dynamics and normally armed with no more than a 0.50 calibre (12.7 millimeter) machinegun in an unprotected mount, has been rebuilt with an armored turret containing a 30 mm quickfiring cannon.

                  The upgrade from funding receipt to prototype delivery spanned a scant 15-months and included design, build and integration of a Kongsberg MCT-30mm Weapon System, remotely operated, unmanned turret, a new fully integrated Commander’s Station, upgraded driveline componentry and hull modifications.

                  Comment


                  • I still like the Samson II RWS - like a turret and the commander can stick their head out.

                    Comment


                    • Comment


                      • Looks like the UK is buying Boxers: http://www.defense-aerospace.com/art...-a-tender.html

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by TangoSierra View Post
                          http://breakingdefense.com/2016/10/a..._hsmi=36638864

                          Today, after 18 months of urgent work, the Army rolled out its first upgunned Stryker vehicle, nicknamed Dragoon. The armored eight-wheel-drive troop transport, built by General Dynamics and normally armed with no more than a 0.50 calibre (12.7 millimeter) machinegun in an unprotected mount, has been rebuilt with an armored turret containing a 30 mm quickfiring cannon.

                          The upgrade from funding receipt to prototype delivery spanned a scant 15-months and included design, build and integration of a Kongsberg MCT-30mm Weapon System, remotely operated, unmanned turret, a new fully integrated Commander’s Station, upgraded driveline componentry and hull modifications.
                          Originally posted by Graylion View Post
                          Originally posted by Graylion View Post
                          Looks like the UK is buying Boxers: http://www.defense-aerospace.com/art...-a-tender.html

                          MOD: While these posts are somewhat relevant by way of comparison to our efforts please post any furthur information regarding Foreign Forces in the Foreign Forces thread.
                          "Let us be clear about three facts. First, all battles and all wars are won in the end by the infantryman. Secondly, the infantryman always bears the brunt. His casualties are heavier, he suffers greater extremes of discomfort and fatigue than the other arms. Thirdly, the art of the infantryman is less stereotyped and far harder to acquire in modern war than that of any other arm." ------- Field Marshall Wavell, April 1945.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Graylion View Post
                            Looks like the UK is buying Boxers: http://www.defense-aerospace.com/art...-a-tender.html
                            Nothing official

                            Comment


                            • Surely those posts added to the thread as its about the MOWAG "Replacement" and these are viable alternatives or show upgrades that would enhance our existing fleet rather than replace them

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by apc View Post
                                Surely those posts added to the thread as its about the MOWAG "Replacement" and these are viable alternatives or show upgrades that would enhance our existing fleet rather than replace them

                                MOD: Again.While the procurement decisions of other forces with regard to similar vehicles are somewhat relevant it is this MOD's opinion that they deserving of their own threads in the Foreign Forces section.
                                "Let us be clear about three facts. First, all battles and all wars are won in the end by the infantryman. Secondly, the infantryman always bears the brunt. His casualties are heavier, he suffers greater extremes of discomfort and fatigue than the other arms. Thirdly, the art of the infantryman is less stereotyped and far harder to acquire in modern war than that of any other arm." ------- Field Marshall Wavell, April 1945.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X