An ex-Cityjet (donated) RJ85 arrived at Baldonnel today to be decommissioned and used for ground training
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Impact of DF or DOD Policies
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by A/TEL View PostFirefighting or Air Corps College
Back in the bad ole days, the Air Corps had a Crashed (belgian?) Fouga which was used for ground training. However nothing better to get familiarity on the intricacies of aircraft technology, without ripping up a live aircraft is to have a grounded one to work on.
While parts and design may be different, most share the same basic control functions.For now, everything hangs on implementation of the CoDF report.
Comment
-
Originally posted by na grohmiti View PostYou don't need an aircraft for firefighting training. If you try, you'll only be able to use it once.
Also it may also be useful to other DF units outside of the Air Corps.Last edited by CTU; 17 April 2020, 22:24.It was the year of fire...the year of destruction...the year we took back what was ours.
It was the year of rebirth...the year of great sadness...the year of pain...and the year of joy.
It was a new age...It was the end of history.
It was the year everything changed.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by DeV View PostAn ex-Cityjet (donated) RJ85 arrived at Baldonnel today to be decommissioned and used for ground training
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by Anzac View PostHow is there political problems flying an aircraft that is there for global good? HADR operations into 3rd countries flatten by tropical cyclones, famines, earthquakes, forest fires ect. Repatriations of stranded nationals ....
Comment
-
Originally posted by Anzac View PostThe inverse now applies downunder in NZ - it did not used to be that way. If our Boeings were sold, and the NZ government bought two executive jets for politicians to jolly around like "rock stars and billionaires" - now that would be deeply unpopular. Not that long ago that may have happened, culling the P-3's was a distinct possibility, the public and politicians really didn't care if it happened or not.
So what is different? Something that is not often recognised or even mentioned on defence forums / discussions, but an increasingly important aspect of the corporate culture of a modern defence force in this day and age. Public Relations.
Downunder the majority of public now understand and have been deliberately messaged over the past few years that their defence force is an extension and enabler of "NZ Inc's" soft power in terms of trade and diplomacy and one of the key avenues for that is involvement in HADR ops - the NZDF even has a marketing campaign slogan "A Force for Good". The public here have no brook at all with the NZDF flying off to anywhere in the Asia-Pacific on a HADR mission with medical supplies, food, ect - or an Antartica science mission is support of "climate change" - they lap it up or at worst are fairly neutral. However, a politician flying on NZDF aircraft other than the PM internationally is now unheard of - the media will cook up a storm as a case of politicians misusing an important national asset - MATS is virtually a dead duck now.
Is it that the Irish Defence Force are great at what they do but useless at communicating that greatness to the public which completely undermines the value of what they do to the nation state and their ability to get both public and political support for the required tools to do their job?
A significant element in what the NZDF (and even better at it are the ADF who taught us this rat cunning comms approach) do these days is communicating to Joe and Jane Public and Jack and Jill Politician what they do and why they do it. An open invitation into the media, hugely active on social media, constant engagement with the community. In 10 years they have gone from near the bottom of the public service trust rankings to near the top.
The only thing the NZDF changed is the Comms / PR strategy - doctrine is the same - yet the NZDF is in better shape and becoming better equipped. Using outfits like Clemenger BBDO to shape their messaging, having famous sportsman and celebrities train alongside or just hang out with the troops.
A charm offensive or "Hearts and Minds" by a Defence Force is not just applicable during a SASO mission in East Timor or Mali but institutionally just as important for political and fiscal survival at home in this day and age.
- Likes 4
Comment
-
Originally posted by DeV View PostIn fairness the DF have come on leaps and bounds in the last 10 years at PR.... the problem is the Department (who advise the Government on policy and hold the purse strings)
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Our civil service system, probably by design does not assist the idea of seconding exers into Departments. Most promotion is from within (god help us) and the few external appointments to management roles are rarely to anywhere capable of making important decisions. Instead start at low level to complete the brainwashing process.
Our Dept of Finance, however in th epast has been quite DF friendly. Unfortunately their instructions come from the DoD, rather from the DF directly, and therein lies the problem.For now, everything hangs on implementation of the CoDF report.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by na grohmiti View PostOur civil service system, probably by design does not assist the idea of seconding exers into Departments. Most promotion is from within (god help us) and the few external appointments to management roles are rarely to anywhere capable of making important decisions. Instead start at low level to complete the brainwashing process.
Our Dept of Finance, however in th epast has been quite DF friendly. Unfortunately their instructions come from the DoD, rather from the DF directly, and therein lies the problem.
So what influence and power within the Executive does the Taoiseach have? His henchmen the Chief of Staff to the PM and the Secretary to the Cabinet (or what ever the local equivalent is called) for that matter? Certainly more than enough to parachute into anywhere anyone they handpick.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Anzac View PostThough the real power is in the DPMC and Finance ministry if you get the Foreign Affairs and Trade folk onside as allies, the DoD is out manouvered. Then come the media columns questioning the competency of the Department, then comes ex Defence Force staff seconded into the department, then the ex CAS gets placed into controlling acquisition and capability policy. Seen it happen, so keep at it.Originally posted by Anzac View PostWe once had the same problem. The NZ Ministry of Defence was a basketcase. It got solved and three new Deputy Securities were moved in as the opportunities arose. One an ex Chief of Air Force, the other two from the security intelligence services with foreign affairs backgrounds.
So what influence and power within the Executive does the Taoiseach have? His henchmen the Chief of Staff to the PM and the Secretary to the Cabinet (or what ever the local equivalent is called) for that matter? Certainly more than enough to parachute into anywhere anyone they handpick.
The issue would appear to be that the Secretary General (Civil servant) of DoD has more power over most areas of the DF than the COS. Now if you had a pro-DF Department that is ok but we don’t.
Ireland is Constitutional restricted on the amount of Ministers in the Cabinet
Comment
-
Originally posted by DeV View PostGiven that the Taoiseach is the current Minister of Defence (with a Junior Minister with Special Responsibility for Defence).... that’s how much pull he has.
Maybe the Mods could start a thread that also addresses the organisational improvements to the DoD as it is seemingly is a significant road block to change and development within the DF - which and they should be reminded is the only reason they need to exist and have jobs.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Anzac View PostAs I suspected that is more than enough to make the required behaviour modifications to the DoD.
Maybe the Mods could start a thread that also addresses the organisational improvements to the DoD as it is seemingly is a significant road block to change and development within the DF - which and they should be reminded is the only reason they need to exist and have jobs.
Defence is also handy as you wont have to travel too far for external meetings, but you still get to travel. I'm sure the travel between DoD offices and the ministers office keeps most staff in t&s nicely.For now, everything hangs on implementation of the CoDF report.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Anzac View PostAs I suspected that is more than enough to make the required behaviour modifications to the DoD.
Maybe the Mods could start a thread that also addresses the organisational improvements to the DoD as it is seemingly is a significant road block to change and development within the DF - which and they should be reminded is the only reason they need to exist and have jobs.Last edited by Laners; 24 April 2020, 09:25.Don't spit in my Bouillabaisse .
Comment
Comment