Of course not, I was being flippant. Sorry, no offence intended.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Commission on the Defence Forces - Reserve Discussion
Collapse
X
-
'He died who loved to live,' they'll say,
'Unselfishly so we might have today!'
Like hell! He fought because he had to fight;
He died that's all. It was his unlucky night.
http://www.salamanderoasis.org/poems...nnis/luck.html
- Likes 1
-
Well said apod.
I don’t think people realize how stretched we are. Trying to meet Covid tastings, which can literally be upped at a moments notice , regimental duties , TRRs to keep career courses going. Not to mention dealing with Covid inside the organization.
It’s that busy at my call sign rest off for certain tasks is an utter privilege. 72hr+ ATCA task straight into duty.
Courses have to continue in order to facilitate overseas.
There’s no let up.Sir I cant find my peltors........Private they are on your face
- Likes 2
Comment
-
The RDF could probably be used for some taskings to help take pressure off.
Ive done a stint at the Aviva last year and wouldnt mind doing a couple of duties to let the people who are flat out have a breather.
But my BN doesnt seem to want to use us for anything
- Likes 4
Comment
-
Originally posted by apod View PostCome and work in any DF Bks at the moment and realise how flippant and derisive those comments are.
Our people are meeting themselves coming off Covid Tasks which are more often than not seven day a week ones.On top of keeping the Barracks secure, meeting TRRs and being on call for ATCP tasks.
You two are seriously out of touch if you think that what ye stated is even close to the current state of play
However, my profession is ridiculed on an almost daily basis on this site and you don't see me getting upset.
Everyone in the employ of the state is getting shit on at present. Normal rules and conditions of service have gone out the window without discussion, as normal chain of command goes out the window.
But we are all links in the chain. Without my organisation giving 150%, your organisation and the state would soon cease to function. Without your organisation meeting themselves coming off duty, mine would cease to function.
Apologies if we try to see the lighter side now and again. I didn't realise that was also not permitted during the lickdown.For now, everything hangs on implementation of the CoDF report.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by trellheim View PostYes, for sure. My point was there is no independent units any more since 2012 bar NSR. Everyone reports up into a PDF Unit.
Not technically true. The NSR come under Shore Operations unit.
The OC of the reserve is OC Shore Operations, a Commander (Lt Col equiv)
He has the same authority over the NSR as any other Sub-Unit in S OPS.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by A/TEL View PostNot technically true. The NSR come under Shore Operations unit.
The OC of the reserve is OC Shore Operations, a Commander (Lt Col equiv)
He has the same authority over the NSR as any other Sub-Unit in S OPS.
They are legally units under Shore Ops
Comment
-
Dev tells most of the story there.
No other RDF 'grouping' can call itself LUNSR or WUNSR . All the others are part of a Single Force unit e.g. D Coy 7 Bn , 1 MIC AR , 2 CAV AR, 1 BAR AR . This has been the case since 2012. It is not intended to mean that NSR are not part of the Defence Forces and do not have a chain of command and reporting structure like all the others.
The RDF could probably be used for some taskings to help take pressure off.Last edited by trellheim; 21 January 2021, 09:38."Are they trying to shoot down the other drone? "
"No, they're trying to fly the tank"
- Likes 1
Comment
-
So the NSR unit OC is reasonable fo the unit, same as a PDF unit OC. That's a lot of work for the NSR as all unit administration is their responsibility ie H & S, SOP's, OpOrds etc etc.
Pity I only have a few years left and am to old or might consider a transfer to Dublin Unit, their OC is a former MP!Last edited by batterysgt; 21 January 2021, 10:25.
Comment
-
Originally posted by trellheim View PostIn his RTE interview last week he clearly called out Tech Enabled Defence bolstered by the RDF. Thats not the same as saying retain the RDF in its current form.
Moving on we've had at least in the last 21+ years
2000 RDFRIB
2000 White Paper
2005 Reorg
2008 Integrated Reserve
2012 Reorg
Bord Snip ( Cutting the Grat really helped numbers).
2015 White Paper
2019 White Paper Update
------------------------------------------
All have played with the dials but none have actually done anything . Numbers, apart from a tiny couple of jumps, have been on a tremendous slide since.
Commission on the Future for Defence
- Likes 1
Comment
-
2020 was a year that threw us many challenges some of which we are still dealing with, but should we now take a step back and look how things might improve in the future? Could for example there be a greater role and co-operation with Civil Defence ? When we look at many of the taskings that the PDF & RDF are giving the military nature is often absent. Take for example something which most will have forgotten about; the explosion in Beirut during the summer. There was a need for immediate aid (some UNIFIL troops did support) and many countries contributed "first responders" and field hospitals. In an ideal world we might have sent engineers, army medics and items like field hospitals. Other countries did and often the personnel were from their voluntary organisations similar to our Civil Defence.
Might it be an ideas for certain Corps like Engineering, Medical, CIS etc to be more liked to CD, that for non-military tasking they be more involved. That DF can call upon that resource in case of HADR tasking for example?
- Likes 1
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by EUFighter View Post2020 was a year that threw us many challenges some of which we are still dealing with, but should we now take a step back and look how things might improve in the future? Could for example there be a greater role and co-operation with Civil Defence ? When we look at many of the taskings that the PDF & RDF are giving the military nature is often absent. Take for example something which most will have forgotten about; the explosion in Beirut during the summer. There was a need for immediate aid (some UNIFIL troops did support) and many countries contributed "first responders" and field hospitals. In an ideal world we might have sent engineers, army medics and items like field hospitals. Other countries did and often the personnel were from their voluntary organisations similar to our Civil Defence.
Might it be an ideas for certain Corps like Engineering, Medical, CIS etc to be more liked to CD, that for non-military tasking they be more involved. That DF can call upon that resource in case of HADR tasking for example?
The DF already has much useful equipment for some HADR work.
The DF lacks some key enablers - Field Hospital, MRV and tactical airlifters for example
What the DF lacks is sufficient personnel (medical especially and that is as much an establishment problem as a strength problem).
IMHO CD needs to be more centralised rather than decentralised to Local Authorities. One of the few “quangos” that was actually killed off by An Bord Snip Nua was the Civil Defence Board and that role went back to DoD. It had brought on CD leaps and bounds. DoD were in charge when the fiasco over PHECC happened. I wouldn’t see any issue with CD being deployed overseas to get around it could be seconded to Irish Aid under Rapid Response initiative.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by koppiteal View PostThe RDF could probably be used for some taskings to help take pressure off.
Ive done a stint at the Aviva last year and wouldnt mind doing a couple of duties to let the people who are flat out have a breather.
But my BN doesnt seem to want to use us for anything
with the ratio being 80% AR to 20% PDF with an AR Officer OIC.
In short our AR guys have been magnificent and I would go so far as to say that without them we couldn't have kept going last year(and this year so far). I would literally grow out of anyone who disrespected our AR people if they did it on front of me.Simple as.
Originally posted by na grohmiti View PostOf course that's not what I believe. You should know me better than that. It may be 10 years since I wore a uniform, but I pass a working barracks daily, and it is clear to all that the phrase "do more with less" is being tested to the absolute by the DF.
However, my profession is ridiculed on an almost daily basis on this site and you don't see me getting upset.
Everyone in the employ of the state is getting shit on at present. Normal rules and conditions of service have gone out the window without discussion, as normal chain of command goes out the window.
But we are all links in the chain. Without my organisation giving 150%, your organisation and the state would soon cease to function. Without your organisation meeting themselves coming off duty, mine would cease to function.
Apologies if we try to see the lighter side now and again. I didn't realise that was also not permitted during the lickdown.
Genuinely.You need to withdraw the comment without equivocation.As has been said before.Words Matter.Last edited by apod; 21 January 2021, 18:41."Let us be clear about three facts. First, all battles and all wars are won in the end by the infantryman. Secondly, the infantryman always bears the brunt. His casualties are heavier, he suffers greater extremes of discomfort and fatigue than the other arms. Thirdly, the art of the infantryman is less stereotyped and far harder to acquire in modern war than that of any other arm." ------- Field Marshall Wavell, April 1945.
- Likes 2
Comment
Comment